The untold story in Church
history
- 2,000 years of
hubris,
chutzpah
and the Oppas
of our time
-
22/5/09
Foreword
The present document resulted
from my reading Maurice Pinay’s book, The Plot Against the Church.
Believing that its English translation was not available on the internet,
I decided to write an article which would reflect succinctly the content
of Maurice Pinay’s book.
For over a
century now, rivers of ink have been used printing books, magazines and
newspapers recounting the “facts of life” in its myriad facets. During
this period, humanity went through two major wars, WWI and WWII—without
counting, of course, the Revolutions in Russia and in China. After WWII,
the United States started the Korean [1950s] and Vietnam War [1970s], thus
involving the two Communist regimes of China and Russia.
From the
1970s, there is no country in the world, except for the western countries
- the USA and Europe - that has not witnessed bloodshed, coup d'etats,
man-made disasters, and so on.
Although
western society has not been subjected to the above bloodshed and
revolutions, apart from alleged isolated terrorist acts - as in Italy,
France, Spain, Hungary, and the USA (9/11)
- morality has hit an all time low. Murders, robberies, vandalism, broken
families, divorce, abortion, homosexuality, euthanasia, rape, drug
addiction, new and old diseases, etc., have multiplied a
hundredfold.
We are living
in dire times. In western society, Christianity has all but disappeared.
Since Vatican II, the Catholic Church has changed enormously, from a
traditional to a modernist, politically correct position, in line with the
secular world.
Atheism: the bug of the century
Atheism, previously an isolated
phenomenon among intellectuals, is widely spread today. Governments, the
media, art, sport & entertainment, and the education system have caught
the bug of the century, that is, atheism.
If God is
dead, as Friedrich
Nietzsche
(1844-1900)
asserted,
Christianity is irrelevant and most people accepted that the Catholic
Church had to adapt or die. And adapt the Catholic Church has, in fact, to
the point of being almost unrecognisable.
Notwithstanding the changes, we Catholics are no better off today than we
were fifty years ago, that is, before Vatican II. The Catholic Church is
in a real quandary, to say the least. Many seminaries have closed down;
vocations have dwindled to the point of extinction; convents are almost
empty; church attendance went from 90% to 15% or even less in some
places.
Even so, the
media campaign against Christianity never abates, but becomes ever more
daring. Books, magazines, and newspapers proliferate, and now the
Internet, which tell lies about how bad the Catholic Church has been with
her preaching against and persecution of the “Jews”, that is, Her alleged
“anti-Semitism”, the “evil of the Inquisition” and so forth.
But who is
behind those lies and slander of the Catholic Church? Read on, please,
reader and hopefully, the truth will reveal itself.
Introduction
Nowadays, most
people live without knowledge and understanding of history. What was
taught at school was not genuine history
but a counterfeit, and much historical information has been omitted from
history books,
according to the designs of the new establishment,
namely, Jewish imperialists.
Compare with
the man of previous centuries, the man of the 20th/21st
century has little memory of or respect for his past. He is like a newborn
baby who sees things around him, but cannot make sense of what he is
seeing. In other words, nowadays man, in spite of modern technology, is an
idiot.
It pains me to
use such strong language towards my fellows; but I am compelled to write
what I feel most deeply to be true, that people have no idea how misled
they are by their own government, media, church leaders and so on.
So before
coming to the point; I advise you, dear reader, if you are not a Catholic
- a genuine one - don’t read what follows; it is not for you. The present
writing is for those who want know the truth, the whole truth and nothing
but the truth.
Part One
Ignorance
of history is like living in one-dimension only.
Ignorance of history is like
being far way home and not knowing how to get there.
The more
things change, the more they didn't — ever.
Anti-Semitism
Today, we hear much talk of
“anti-Semitism.” There is not a day that the corporate controlled media
doesn’t use the word. Why? Because it is useful weapon against anybody
who disagrees with the Establishment.
Now to the question what
“anti-Semitic” really means, no one can give the right answer, because an
exact definition of anti-Semitism does not exist. Anti-Semitism is what
the Jewish Establishment decides it to be. It is a rubbery elastic
sort of material that flexes to fit what they need it to cover. Put
another way: Anti-Semitic means “dissenting from the will of Israel and
its cohorts’ interests”.
The establishment says that
“anti-Semitism” started with, and is the result of, Christianity and her
doctrine as expressed in the New Testament and the teachings of the Church
Fathers, and that the Inquisition, because of its condemnation of the
Jews, blaming them for deicide, has been the cause of the sufferings that
the Jews have experienced.
The Establishment is putting the
above obnoxious notions into the heads of ages three to ninety, through
the school system and the media, both controlled by the Establishment
since last century. As I said before, true history is not taught in the
school; indeed nowadays, disdain for Christianity and the Church has
become part of school curriculum.
The Inquisition
Since the Inquisition was abolished in
1834,
the Catholic Church capitulated to her perennial enemy, namely,
Jewish imperialism. The Inquisition, the so-called
“notorious instrument for terrorizing and torturing heretics and witches,”
according to the Church’s opponents,
was in reality the only weapon with which the Church defended herself, for
about four centuries, against her inveterate enemies.
Many documents and books are
written on the history of the Church as it relates to Judaism; but real
facts are hard to come by, for like in war, in history, as it is taught
today, truth is the first casualty.
Re “A History of the Jews”
we read:
|
Contrary
to popular belief, Jews who openly remained Jews were not tortured or
killed as part of the inquisition proceedings. The Inquisition was
specifically authorized by the Church to root out heresy among
Catholics, so only heretical Christians and Jewish converts to
Christianity accused of secretly reverting to Judaism were
prosecuted...
[...]
In
Spain, in the latter part of the 15th century during the reign of
Ferdinand and
Isabella,
many Jews were professed Christians. In secret, however they continued
to behave according to Jewish lore, and Jewish lore demanded the
destruction of the Christian church in Spain.
So grave became the menace finally, that
the Inquisition was instituted in an endeavour to cleanse the country
of these conspirators. Once again the Jews were compelled to commence
an exodus from another country, whose hospitality they had abused. |
Montague
Summers, in his introduction
to the 1928 translation of The Malleus Maleficarum
says:
In the
twelfth century; the wild fanatics who fostered the most subversive and
abominable ideas aimed to put these into actual practice, to establish
communities and to remodel whole territories according to the programme
which they had so carefully considered in every detail with a view to
obtaining and enforcing their own ends and their own interests.
The
heretics were just as... determined to bring about the domination of
their absolutism as is any revolutionary of to-day. The aim and objects
of their leaders, Tanchelin, Everwacher,
the Jew Manasses, Peter Waldo, Pierre
Autier, Peter of Bruys, Arnold of Brescia
and the rest, were exactly those of Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev,
and their fellows… Their motives, their methods, their intentions, the
goal to which they pressed, were all the same.
Their
objects may be summed up as the abolition of monarchy, the abolition of
private property and of inheritance, the abolition of marriage, the
abolition of order, the total abolition of all religion.
It was
against this that the Inquisition had to fight.
The
Inquisition came about for the sole purpose of distinguishing the
pseudo-Christians [Judaics converted to Catholicism or
‘conversos’]
from the genuine Christians, because it was well known that many
conversions from Judaism were not genuine, but an expedient for the
Judaics to save their skin and to achieve their objective of undermining
the Church. After the converts were baptized, they continued practicing
their former religion in secret, thus allowing them to live among
Catholics as crypto-jews or Marranos.
Since the beginning, Judaics have
never ceased to undermine the Catholic Church, whether by fomenting riots,
rebellions, heresies, revolutions and persecutions against Christians in
most of the countries where they resided – or by helping the invading
conqueror
Muslims in Christian countries.
Persecutions
It is an historical fact, that
Jesus Christ was delivered by the whole Sanhedrin
to the Romans to be crucified. Stephen,
one of the seven deacons, was stoned to death,
by the same Judaics. They killed James,
the brother of John with the
sword.
“The Jews stirred up religious and honorable women, and the chief men of
the city, and raised persecution against
Paul and Barnabas:
and cast them out of their coasts”.
That was just the beginning of
persecutions of Christians by the Judaics. And those persecutions have
never ceased throughout 20 centuries of Church history to our day -
although, those persecutions evolved now, dexterously, under the
accusation of “anti-Semitism.”
“What is the proof of your
allegations?” one might ask.
There are countless historical
cases of Christians being subject of persecution by the Judaics.
Nonetheless, I will limit myself here to a few significant examples.
History shows that it is
commonplace for persecution of Christians to be carried out by non-Jews,
having been incited by Jews. In Maurice Pinay, The Plot Against the
Church, (p. 227) we read:
|
It is a historical proven fact, that the
Romans in religious matters were tolerant and also in no way hostilely
disposed towards the Christians, as besides the conduct of
Pilate in the case of Jesus, the favorable
interventions of the Imperial authorities in the persecutions
unleashed by the Jews against Paul and the first Christians prove.
The following fact is very revealing and recorded by Tertullian
and Orosius,
who remark that before the Hebrew attempts at persecutions which
occurred against the Christians, the Emperor Tiberius
had a law published, which threatened those who accused the Christians
with death. |
History of the Christian Church
Vol I, Ch V, The Roman Conflagration and the
Neronian Persecution
states:
|
Josephus
speaks of the crimes of Nero,
but says not a word of any persecution of his fellow-religionists.
This alone seems to be conclusive. It is not unlikely that in this (as
in all previous persecutions, and often afterwards) the fanatical
Jews, enraged by the rapid progress of Christianity, and anxious to
avert suspicion from themselves, stirred up the people against the
hated Galilaeans, and that the heathen Romans fell with double fury on
these supposed half Jews, disowned by their own strange brethren.
|
Barbara
Aho in Mystery, Babylon the Great, Catholic or Jewish? states:
|
Although Constantine
restricted Jewish power and influence, the last of his direct
descendants to become Roman Emperor favored the Jewish religion to the
extent that he made plans to rebuild Jerusalem and the Temple of
Solomon. The deeds of Julian
the Apostate are favorably recorded by Jewish historians such as
H. Graetz,
whose History of the Jews was cited by Maurice Pinay
“In the year 360
Julian, a cousin of
Constantine,
was proclaimed Roman Emperor by the army.
Constantine, who had
prepared for battle against him, died on the way; this made easier the
final victory for Julian
and his proclamation as Emperor of the Orient and Occident. The policy
of Julian had three principle aims: I. To renew the Pagan belief and
to again declare it a state religion of the Empire, so that Rome which
according to his view had declined through Christianity, might return
to its old glory. II. To destroy Christianity. III. To concede to
Jewry its old positions, from which it had been expelled by
Constantine and his sons; even the rebuilding of the Temple of Solomon
was to be arranged…
“The famous Jewish
historian says of Julian...that
Julian paid great admiration to the
Jewish religion and confirms that ‘the period of government by
Julian...was a time
of highest fortune for the Jews of the Roman Empire...’
“Graetz
likewise establishes that Julian called the leader of Jewry in the
Empire, the patriarch Hillel,
literally ‘his respected friend,’ and promised him in a personal
letter to make an end of the misdeeds committed by the Christian
Emperors against the Jews. Further, Julian
made all necessary preparations in order to begin the rebuilding of
the Temple of Jerusalem. He addressed a letter to all Jewish
congregations of the Empire, in which he spoke in friendly way of the
leader of Jewry in the Empire, the
Patriarch Julos (Hillel), as his brother.
He promised the abolition of the high taxes laid upon the Israelites
by the Christians, guaranteed that in the future none should accuse
them of blasphemy, promised freedom and security and promised to have
Jerusalem rebuilt at his expense, as soon as he returned victorious
from the Persian war. For the rebuilding of the Temple of Jerusalem
Julian commissioned his best
friend, Alypius of Antioch,
to whom he gave instructions to spare no expense, and commanded the
governors of Palestine and Syria, to assist with everything
necessary...” (pp. 285-6)
The death of
Julian
in 363 A.D. curtailed plans for rebuilding Solomon’s Temple; however,
the Jewish Virtual Library boasts of a Hebrew revival in Rome
in the centuries which followed... |
A striking episode of violence,
murder and Judaic terror was during the reign of
Peter the Cruel in Spain in the 14th
century. The document, “Conspiracy Theory - Jewish
Terror in Castile in the 14th Century”
states:
|
After the treachery of the
Jews which led to the fall of the Christian Visigoth kingdom and its
conquest through the Musulmans, began the so-called “Reconquista”. It
was introduced by the Christians who had become powerful in the
mountains to the north of the peninsula under the
Visigoth Pelayo.
[...]
Through the regard of the Jewish minister, the Jews gradually gained
more and more influence in the kingdom. Concerning this the Jewish
historian Bedarride
gives us exact details, asserting that the Jews had reached “the high
point of their power” under Peter the
Cruel in Castile.
Unfortunately, however,
history proves to us that every time the Jews in a Christian or pagan
state attain “the high point of their power”, a terrible wave of
murders and terror is unleashed, and Christian or pagan blood flows in
streams. Thus it also occurred under
Peter from the
moment when the Jews obtained decisive influence upon education and
government. This intelligent child – who later showed himself as
far-sighted, had great illusions and possessed enormous energy – would
perhaps have been one of the most important monarchs of Christianity,
if he had not been destroyed in his youth through the bad example and
the still worse advice of his Jewish favourites and counsellors. The
people held them guilty for the wave of crimes and ambushes which were
unleashed under this bloody government. The Jews attained high regard
and the synagogues prospered, while the Churches decayed and the
clergy and the Christians were disgracefully persecuted.
Many contemporary and later
Chroniclers report concerning the decisive influence of the Jews on
the young monarch and their malicious power in relation to the
cruelties during this stormy time of government. The French
contemporary Cuvelier
asserts that Henry,
the half-brother of the king, “was begged and implored by the Spanish
nobles to once again bring to the notice of the King that he acted
badly in allowing himself to be counselled by the Jews and to expel
the Christians”... “When Henry
came into the royal palace of his brother, the latter was just having
a council with several Jews. No Christians were present.” “Henry
implored Peter, nevertheless, not
to listen to the counsels of the Jews.” The Chronicler reports in
addition of a Jew named Jacob who
was present and clearly stood very close to Peter.
Paul Hay de Chartelet, another
well-known French Chronicler, adds further to this episode in
reference to the aforementioned counsellor of King Peter,
that Henry of Trastamara could not
conceal his anger “when he saw a Jew named Jacob”,
who enjoyed the full confidence of Peter
and whom was held to be the instigator of all his cruel actions.
Concerning the terrible
crimes during the bloody period of government of
Peter the Cruel report the
“Prima Vita Urbani V”, the Italian contemporary Chronicler
Matteo Villani, and the Mohammedan
Chronicler … Abou Zeid-Ibn Khaldoun,
who makes the assurance among others, “that Peter
cruelly oppressed the Christian people and on account of his tyranny
made himself
so greatly hated that they rebelled against him.” In the Chronicle
from the time of Peter of Aragon
the criminal action of this government is described in a hair-raising
manner, and in his renowned Chronicle of reminiscences the Frenchman
Jean Froissard mentions not only
the cruelty and tyranny which were characteristic of this government,
but particularly stresses the hostile conduct of Peter the
Cruel towards the
Church and the Papacy.
[...] It is therefore
certainly possible that they applied the same methods with
Peter and the news
seeped through into the hostile camp, where they later used Trastamara
as a banner against Peter. However
this may be, it is nevertheless evident that Peter,
with his murdering of clergy, persecution of the Church and elevation
of the Jews, acted more as a Jew than as a Christian, which had the
consequence that the story of the exchange of children was believed.
The following Chronicles
reveal that Peter
was of Jewish origin: the Chronicle from the same period about
Peter IV of Aragon,
the Chronicle of the contemporary Carmelite
Father Juan de Venette,
the anonymous Chronicle about the first four
Valois, the likewise contemporary Chronicle of
Cuvelier
among others. |
The above piece is quite
eloquent in regard to the cruelty and horrors perpetrated by the Judaics
against Christianity throughout history, often by proxy.
Michael Hoffman, in Judaism Discovered (p. 334) wrote:
|
In 1449,
Pedro Sarmiento
fulminated against the deeds of Iberian Judaics. Chief among the
charges was the idea of Judaics of Toledo, had opened the gates of the
invading Moors. “...when Toledo was first taken by the Moors it was
filled with Hebrews...they resenting the Gothic persecution,
facilitated the progress of the Berbers...” |
I am well aware that there are
not a few who would dispute the present writing saying that my sources of
information are not reputable, or that I harbor ‘anti-Semitic’ feelings,
or whatever ‘fancy’ label they wish to stick on me.
That is the nature of the beast,
the satanic spirit of Talmudic Judaism. No matter what one says, that is
not in agreement with this diabolic spirit, because that what it is, in
reality, becomes anathema to them [Judaics].
It is true that the above facts
belong to the past. However, what of the French Revolution of 1789, or
more recently the Russian Revolution? Who were the perpetrators of these
diabolic rebellions?
Maurice Pinay’s book, The Plot
Against the Church, Part One - The Secret Driving Force Of Communism,
Chapter One - Communism as Destroyer
states:
|
Of all revolutionary systems, which
throughout human history have been devised for the destruction of our
civilised values, Communism is without doubt the most perfected, most
efficient and most merciless. In fact it represents the most advanced
epoch of the world revolution, in whose postulates it therefore not
only acts to destroy a definite political, social, economic or moral
institution, but also simultaneously to declare null and void the Holy
Catholic Church as well as all cultural and Christian manifestations
which represent our civilisation.
All revolutionary currents of Jewish
origin have attacked Christianity in its different aspects with
particular one-mindedness. Communism, spawned from this same
revolutionary stream of thought, seeks to banish Christianity for the
purpose of causing it to vanish from the face of the earth, without
even the slightest trace remaining. The destructive fury of this
satanic striving, which brings before the eyes of the world the most
terrible pictures of terror and destruction which are possible to
imagine, can only be based on the essence of Nihilism and the most
evil, hate-filled rejection of everything hitherto existing. For
otherwise, one would not be able to understand the indescribable
insanity of its criminal acts and the spirit of destruction, of
annihilation, of insult, of contradiction and of resistance by its
leading personalities against everything, which represents fundamental
features not only of Catholicism but of religion in general. (p.33) |
Part Two
“What is
truth? Truth is what I decide it is.”
The international rabbi
Heresies
I have written a few articles about how, from the
Reformation, on through the French Revolution and the European 19th
century revolutions, and the Russian Revolution in 1917, the Jewish
Establishment
became what it is today.
There is also another devious
aspect of the Judaic Internationalism [or as Rev.
Father Denis Fahey called it,
Jewish Naturalism],
which needs to be exposed, since it never appears in the press, that is,
as the mastermind and fabricator of heresies, or more so as the
anti-Christ.
Arianism
(250–336
AD)
Arianism has been one of the most virulent heresies in
Church history. During the period of the Arian heresy, the Church
experienced one of the greatest schisms of her entire history. More than
half of Catholic bishops joined the Arian camp and only a handful of
bishops
had the courage to fight this heresy and its promoters, who were the
avowed self-styled “Jews” themselves.
In Maurice Pinay,
The Plot against the Church
(pps 296, 298) we read:
|
It is understandable, that
Saint Ambrose,
Bishop of Milan and a great Church leader in his time, was dismayed
that Theodosius allowed the Jews to
overstep the laws of Rome, which blocked admission for them to the
Senate as well as allowing them no admittance to the army and to
government positions; for he was conscious of the great harm, which
they could cause Christianity and the Empire, if they gained control
of the government. A further important fact must be mentioned. The
Jews were the initiators and propagandists of the Arian heresy, to
which sect many Germanic barbarians from the frontier regions also
belonged, of whom the majority, which was an open secret, were
inspired by the wish to attack and conquer the Roman Empire. If
Saint John Chrysostom had lived in
our times, then undoubtedly the Jews and their satellites within
Christianity would have thrown against them the accusation of being
Nazis and disciples of Hitler, just
as they do the same with all zealous Catholics who at present wish to
protect the Church from the Jewish threat. The Jew
Graetz says,
as we have played in that period of open struggle of Holy Church
against the Jews:
“The chief fanatics against
the Jews in that time were John
Chrysostom of
Antioch and Ambrose of Milan,
who attacked the Jews with most extreme violence,” [...]
However, the Saints who saved Catholicism
in such different times, had to pass along a painful path of
suffering; and in fact not only from the side of Jewry, against which
they fought with such resolution, but also from the side of those
within the clergy, who consciously or unconsciously served the
interests of the Jews. We have already seen that Saint
Athanasius
was persecuted by the bishop adhering to the heresy of the Jew
Arius,
as also by the Emperors standing under the heretical influence. Even
two Church Councils did not call a halt to this, but these that had
actually been summoned for the salvation of Catholicism, transformed
themselves, once they were controlled by the Arians and turned against
the Orthodoxy, into veritable heretical Councils. |
As I stated before, the Arian
heresy caused great harm to the Church for about two hundred years.
Notwithstanding, from the beginning, the Church did withstand several
kinds of heresies, in particular,
Gnosticism [incidentally the brainchild of Cabbala
which is the very spirit of Talmud, the sacred book of Judaism] from which
the New Age philosophy sprang.
Arianism’s influence, though,
lasted two centuries
and spread far and wide, in particular in the north of Italy. Chapter 31,
“The Great Pope Gregory VII (Hildebrand)
Destroys a Jewish Theocracy in North Italy” (p.545) states:
|
The Jewish influence in
Lombardy was so great that in many cities Christians honoured the
Sabbath (Saturday) instead of Sunday, and even the Cathars in this
region accepted parts of the Old Testament in contrast to the
Provencals. Arianism
had left behind deep traces in North Italy, and its tolerance towards
the Jews favoured their position and at the same time prepared the
climate for countless anti-Papal sects, among whom stood out the
Jewish. Without doubt the most important, that of the Passagii,
was strongly influenced by the flourishing Jewry in Lombardy.” |
Middle Ages heresies
Contrary to what the official and recognized version
of history says, it has been proven that the Inquisition was established
by the Church in order to defend herself, first from the crypto-Jews,
second from heretics. Now it happened that, in most of the cases, the
crypto-Jews and heretics were the one and the same people who, undeterred,
wanted nothing more than the destruction of the Catholic Church.
In Maurice Pinay’s book, Chapter
29 - Secret Jewry and the Heresies of the Middle Ages – The Albigensians
(pp 530-531) we read:
|
In the official publication
of the respected Jewish historian, N.
Leven, intended for internal use by Jewry,
“Fifty Years History - The Universal Jewish Alliance” … it is stated
word for word:
“At the beginning of the 13th century
the Church faced the heresy of the Albigensians, which had arisen in
southern France. The Albigensians are not the only Christians who
attack the Church and its dogmas. On the other side also there are
unbelievers. For this the Jews are guilty; the Albigensians received
their instructions from them, and many a one admits that the Jewish
doctrine is to be preferred to the Christian. The Jews are the
founders of heresy. The church recognises this, and therefore the Jews
alarm it. They were destroyed in material aspect, but in all their
spiritual power they have received no harm. . . Pope Innocent
III, who strove for
domination over Europe, encountered in this little people (Israel) a
hindrance which he had to overcome. At the commencement of his period
of office he wished for neither the death of the Jews nor their
compulsory conversion. He hoped to be able to triumph over them
through humiliation and leniency. The Pope directed his attack against
the Albigensians. South France is conquered with blood and fire. The
Jews are thrown into one pot with the Albigensians and die with them.
. . . When in 1197
he took over the Pontificate, he had forbidden the crusaders to rob
the Jews and to convert them with force. In 1209
they were confused with Albigensians and cut down with them. . . The
Council of Avignon
later obligated all Barons and free cities under oath to remove the
Jews from all positions and services with Christians and to compel
them to practise the Christian religion.” |
Heresies & Reformation
In Chapter 30 - The Jews as
Most Dangerous Enemies of the Church, The Waldenses, (pp 539-544),
Maurice Pinay quotes highly regarded Jewish sources which provide us with
details about the role which the Jews played in the heresies which nearly
conquered Europe and destroyed Holy Church, and that the Reformation too
had the stamp of the international Jewry:
|
The
Jewish-Spanish Encyclopaedia
mentions the attitude of the Church to the mediaeval heresies and
confirms the assertions of priests and writers of most different
epochs, who made the assurance that
“the Jews were the fathers of the
heresies.” Then it is stated
expressly:
“In the same way as the Inquisition,
it accused the Jews of having
instigated the mediaeval heresies, and all heterodox movements were
for the Church the result of a Jewish conspiracy,
and the instigators and leaders Jews.” It is clear that neither Holy
Church nor the Inquisition lied. In addition they had sufficient
proofs to base their assertions upon.
The rabbi Lewis
Browne writes in addition in his
interesting “History of the Jews,” in the chapter, ‘The Disunion of
the Church…The Help of the Jews in
the Protestant Reformation’: “It is
more than only a thorn. Since the Synagogue was represented in all
Christian lands, it had the effect everywhere like a network of small
swords, which injured the self-satisfaction of the Church. This
explains the fact that the Church allowed the Jews no pause to rest.
It was her most dangerous foe, since everywhere it wandered, it
promoted heresies.” This learned Rabbi expresses not only completely
openly the greatest of all truths, by his describing
the Jews as the worst enemies of the
Church, but also gives us the
solution to what was for many a great mystery, i.e. the rapid
spreading of the mediaeval heresies, later of freemasonry
and finally of Marxist Communism,
over the individual lands. Since there have been Jewish organisations
all over the world for many centuries, which have the effect of “a
network of small swords,” being represented in all lands through
influential personalities and having everywhere a great financial
power, it is naturally an easy thing for them to spread with
astonishing rapidity every revolutionary, public and secret movement
or every other kind of connection and to provide it with international
regard. Only an institution like the synagogue, which has been rooted
for centuries in all parts bf the world, could provide so many
perverse movements rapidly with an international character. As a
result it has attempted and still attempts through its favourite
weapon, deceit, to rule the peoples and to make freedom impossible. |
Part Three
Freemasonry & Revolutions
The Jews’ hubris, deceptions,
bullying, violence and revolutions throughout history are never-ending and
innumerable. However, in this essay I feel compelled to draw the reader’s
attention only to the most salient ones. From the early times, the
Catholic Church had to suffer from her perennial enemy persecution, as
well as heresies, riots and other kinds of evil which, unfettered, have
never stopped to assail her to the present day.
Of course, throughout history,
the methods used by the synagogue in persecuting the Church changed with
the times. People change with the times, and so do the schemes of Church
opponents. New ideas, new techniques, and new disguises are excogitated,
in order for the Jews to achieve their ultimate goal: to destroy the
Church and what good She has done on earth.
Some centuries ago, well before
the formation of the Grand
Lodge of England in 1717,
realizing that persecution, riots and heresies did not actually achieve
their ultimate goal, namely the downfall of the Church, the synagogue
masterminded the creation of Freemasonry which, being a
secret society, acts apparently to outsiders and its own lower ranks, as a
humanitarian organization, but behind the scenes, as the deadly enemy of
the Christian civilization, thus of all humanity.
From the start, many nations,
governments and monarchies have been subjected to the evil deeds of
Freemasonry. The 17th century Reformation, the 18th
century French Revolution, the 19th century European
Revolutions, World War I, the 1917 Russian Revolution, WWII, the 1949
Revolution in China, Israel/Palestinian conflict [continuing today], the
Korean and Vietnam Wars, and many other conflicts and genocides around the
world, there is not one of them in which the lodge had not, directly or
indirectly, been involved.
“It was the Jews that introduced
Freemasonry into the United States of America; and the Jews have always
been a powerful influence in the American Masonic organization” and “The
Judeo-Masonic Peril is a question of life or death for all nations,” says
Monsignor E. Jouin, Les Fideles De La Contre-Eglise Macons, pps
37-45.
Holocaust/Shoah
As our subtitle “2,000 years of hubris, chutzpah, and
the Oppas of our time” suggests, there is a long history of evil things,
with no end in sight. To add offence to injury, the self-styled Jews have
invented the ultimate weapon to be used against the Catholic Church and
everyone who doesn’t follow the party line. The ultimate weapon is the
holocaust, in which it is alleged that 6,000,000 Jews died under the Nazi
regime during WWII.
There are not a few people –
called revisionists - behind bars today, because they dispute the number
of the dead, or others who say that the holocaust never occurred.
As a matter of interest, the
table below shows the population of Christians deceased, while the number
of Jews increased between 1934 and 1949.
|
|
Christians |
Jews |
|
1934 World Almanac |
682,400,000 |
15,315,000 |
|
1949 World Almanac |
592,406,542 |
15,753,638 |
|
Perceived difference |
-89,993,458 |
+438,648 |
states:
|
"...the Vatican last week
conditioned Williamson’s
rehabilitation on his “absolutely, unequivocally and publicly”
recanting his position on the Holocaust. Williamson has refused, at
least for the time being. First he wants to review the historical
evidence. "If I find proof I would rectify [earlier statements],"
Williamson told the German weekly magazine Der Spiegel, adding later,
"But all that will take time."
"It is outrageous that
Pope Benedict XVI
did not immediately respond to Williamson’s stalling tactics by
reinstating the renegade bishop’s excommunication. When members of the
Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations
leaders meet with the pope later this week (Feb. 12), they must demand
that he categorically and permanently revoke Williamson’s
rehabilitation. " |
Hoffman's
comment is:
|
You can deny the Virgin
Birth in Germany. You can claim Blessed Mary was a harlot. You can
deny the Resurrection. You can deny the Israeli holocaust against
Palestinians and the Allied holocaust against Dresden. All of those
are mere "opinions" of men. The only divine truth is execution gas
chambers in Auschwitz. This is what the "Shoah"
theology has created: the de-sacrilegation of Christianity and
state-enforced belief in Holocaustianity. The "Shoah"
theology represents the gradual erosion of the claims of the New
Testament and the increasing supremacy of Orthodox Judaism's
weltanschauung. |
The ‘holocaust’ today takes the
place of the Christian cross which, for 2,000 years, has been the
Christian symbol of Redemption and atonement for all who believe that
Jesus Christ died on the cross for our sins, but was raised again in order
for us to follow Him.
Hence the new ‘hate crime’,
‘anti-Semitism’, and anti-discrimination laws are only devices to suppress
any criticism of the Establishment, namely the synagogue, Israel and their
Zionist cohort. Furthermore the Cabbalistic [magic] number 6,000,000
is the sacred pedestal on which the Zionist state of Israel rests, for
without it Israel would have nothing to stand on: that is, its ‘reason
d’etre’.
A summary:
From the writing, “Judæo-Masonic Christophobia
- "The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church" we read:
Of course, their "Jewish King"
is the Antichrist!
During the 1950’s, the
association, "Advocates of Our Lady," of Chicago, Illinois, featured in
their newsletter, Alerte!, #28, the report below:
"In the London Catholic
Gazette of February 1936, was published a sensational article under the
heading: "The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church." The monthly organ of
the Catholic Missionary Society of England was quoting speeches delivered
in a series of secret Jewish meetings in Paris. A few weeks later, the
Parisian weekly, Le Revell du Peuple, published a similar account, adding
that the statements had been made at a recent convention of the
B’nai-B’rith (Secret Masonic order into which no Gentile is admitted) held
in Paris.
"The article of the Catholic Gazette read as follows:
"That there has been and still
is a Jewish problem, no one can deny. Since the rejection of Israel, 1900
years ago, the Jews have scattered in every direction, and in spite of
difficulties and even persecution, they have established themselves as a
power in nearly every nation of Europe. Jacobs, in his Jewish
Contributions to Civilization, glories in the fact that without detriment
to their own racial unity and International character, the Jews have been
able to spread their doctrines and increase their political, social and
economic influence among the nations."
"In view of this Jewish problem, which affects the Catholic Church in
a special way, we publish the following amazing extracts from a number of
speeches recently made under the auspices of a Jewish society in Paris.
The name of our informant must remain concealed. He is personally known to
us, but by reason of his peculiar relations with the Jews at the present
time, we have agreed not to disclose his identity nor to give any further
details of the Paris meeting beyond the following extracts which, though
sometimes freely translated, nevertheless substantially convey the meaning
of the original statement (Editor’s Note).
|
"As long as there remains among the
Gentiles any moral conception of the social order, and until all
faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our reign over the world
shall not come. We have already fulfilled part of our work, but we
cannot yet claim that the whole of our work is done. We have still a
long way to go before we can overthrow our main opponent: the Catholic
Church...
"We must always bear in mind that the Catholic Church is the only
institution which has stood, and which will, as long as it remains in
existence, stand in our way. The Catholic Church, with her methodical
work and her edifying and moral teachings, will always keep her
children in such a state of mind, as to make them too self-respecting
to yield to our domination, and to bow before our future King of
Israel. That is why we have been striving to discover the best way of
shaking the Catholic Church to her very foundations. We have spread
the spirit of revolt and false liberalism among the nations of the
Gentiles... to persuade them away from their faith and even to make
them ashamed of professing the precepts of their Religion and obeying
the Commandments of their Church.
"We have brought many of them to boast of being atheists, and more
than that, to glory in being descendants of the ape! We have given
them new theories, impossible of realization, such as Communism,
Anarchism, and Socialism, which are now serving our purposes.
"The stupid Gentiles
have accepted them with the greatest enthusiasm, without realizing
that those theories are ours, and that they constitute our most
powerful instrument against themselves... We have blackened the
Catholic Church with the most ignominious calumnies. We have blackened
her history and disgraced even her noblest activities. We have imputed
to her the wrongs of her enemies, and have thus brought these latter
to stand more closely by our side. So much so, that we are now
witnessing, to our greatest satisfaction, rebellions against the
Church in several countries.
"We have turned her Clergy into objects of hatred and ridicule, we
have subjected them to the contempt of the crowd. We have caused the
practice of the Catholic religion to be considered out of date and a
mere waste of time... And the Gentiles, in their stupidity, have
proved easier dupes than we expected them to be. One would expect more
intelligence and more practical common sense, but they are no better
than a herd of sheep.
"Let them graze in
our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of being immolated
to our future King of the world...
"We have founded many secret associations, which all work for our
purpose, under our orders and our directions. We have made it an honor,
a great honor, for the Gentiles to join us in our organizations, which
are, thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it
remains our secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most
precious interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that
those associations are of our creation, and that they serve our
purpose.
"One of the many triumphs of our Freemasonry is that those Gentiles
who become members of our lodges, should never suspect that we are
using them to build their own jails, upon whose terraces we shall
erect the throne of our Universal King of Israel; and should never
know that we are commanding them to forge the chains of their own
servility to our future King of the World.
"So far, we have
considered our strategy in our attacks upon the Catholic Church from
the outside. But this is not all. Let us now explain how we have gone
further in our work, to hasten the ruin of the Catholic Church and how
we have penetrated into her most intimate circles, and brought even
some of her Clergy to become pioneers of our cause."
"Apart altogether from the influence of our philosophy, we have taken
other steps to secure a breach in the Catholic Church. Let me explain
how this has been done.
"We have induced some of our children to join the Catholic body, with
the explicit intimation that they should work in a still more
efficient way for the disintegration of the Catholic Church, by
creating scandals within her.
"We have thus followed the advice of our Prince of the Jews, who so
wisely said: 'Let some of your children become canons, so that they
may destroy the Church.' Unfortunately, not all among the 'convert'
Jews have proved faithful to their mission. Many of them have even
betrayed us! But, on the other hand, others have kept their promise
and honored their word.
"Thus, the counsel of our Elders has proved successful.
"We are the Fathers
of all Revolutions—even of those which sometimes happen to turn
against us. We are the supreme Masters of Peace and War.
"We can boast of being the Creators of the REFORMATION!
"Calvin was one of our Children; he was of Jewish descent, and was
entrusted by Jewish authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to
draft his scheme in the Reformation.
"Martin Luther yielded to the influence of his Jewish friends, and
again, by Jewish authority, and with Jewish finance his plot against
the Catholic Church met with success.
"Thanks to our propaganda, to our theories of Liberalism and to our
misrepresentations of Freedom, the minds of many among the Gentiles
were ready to welcome the Reformation. They separated from the Church
to fall into our snare. And thus the Catholic Church has been very
sensibly weakened, and her authority over the Kings of the Gentiles
has been reduced almost to naught.
"We are grateful to
Protestants for their loyalty to our wishes—although most of them are,
in the sincerity of their faith, unaware of their loyalty to us.
"We are grateful to them for the wonderful help they are giving us in
our fight against the stronghold of Christian Civilization, and in our
preparations for the advent of our supremacy over the whole world and
over the Kingdoms of the Gentiles.
"So far, we have succeeded in overthrowing most of the Thrones of
Europe. The rest will follow in the near future.
"Russia has already worshipped our rule. France, with her Masonic
Government, is under our thumb. England, in her dependence upon our
finance, is under our heel; and in her Protestantism is our hope for
the destruction of the Catholic Church. Spain and Mexico are but toys
in our hands. And many other countries, including the U. S. A., have
already fallen before our scheming. But the Catholic Church is still
alive...
"We must destroy her without the least delay and without the slightest
mercy.
"Most of the Press in the world is under
our Control; let us therefore encourage in a still more violent way
the hatred of the world against the Catholic Church. Let us intensify
our activities in poisoning the morality of the Gentiles. Let us
spread the spirit of revolution in the minds of the people.
"They must be made to despise Patriotism and the love of their family
to consider their faith as a humbug, their obedience to their Church
as a degrading servility, so that they may become deaf to the appeal
of the Church and blind to her warnings against us.
"Let us, above all, make it impossible for Christians outside the
Catholic Church to be reunited with that Church or for non-Christians
to join the Church; otherwise the greatest obstruction to our
domination will be strengthened and all our work undone.
"Our plot will be unveiled, the Gentiles will turn against us, in the
spirit of revenge, and our domination over them will never be
realized.
"Let us remember that as long as there still remain active enemies of
the Catholic Church, we may hope to become Masters of the World . . .
[nevertheless] the future Jewish King will never reign in the world
before the pope in Rome is dethroned as well as all the other
reigning Monarchs of the Gentiles upon earth."
|
Conclusion
Nowadays, not a few people ask
themselves, “What is wrong with the Catholic Church? Why so many changes
to the sacred liturgy, from Latin to the vulgar language, to religious
garb, to rubrics, with theology, etc?” Ultimately, the last five popes
refused the request of the Virgin Mary at Fatima in 1917 for the
Consecration of the Russia.
The following writing, The
Long Island Conference,
may give some answers to the above questions:
|
In the first place, I must tell you that I
am under no illusions —the situation in Rome is very grave, very
grave. Let me sum up the whole situation as it took place at the
Council and such as, unfortunately, it still exists even today, by
saying that there were, in fact, three betrayals of the Church. Holy
Church was betrayed in three ways in a very direct and concrete
fashion.
The first betrayal was the
betrayal with the Freemasons,
the second with the Protestants,
and the third was the betrayal with the Communists.
There was an understanding
before the Council and during the Council through men commissioned by
the Church who were the instruments of these betrayals, namely, the
Secretariat for the Unity of Christians, which was specially created
for that, directed by Cardinal Bea
with, as Vice President, Mgr*. de Smedt, Bishop of Bruges,
and with, as Secretary, Mgr. Willebrands,
who became Cardinal of
Holland. These were the personalities who
were the instruments of betrayal. There were direct contacts precisely
between Cardinal Bea
and the Masonic Lodge
here in New York and in Washington, with the
B'nai-Brith,
the Jewish Lodge numbering 75,000 members, and with the lodges of the
whole world. …
Why did these contacts take
place? Why did Cardinal Bea
come in the name of the Vatican, in the name of Rome, to meet these
Freemasons?
In order that we would accept the "rights of man" at the Council. How
could we accept them? By accepting Religious Liberty, which is one of
the "rights of man". Hence, to accept Religious Liberty was in
principle to accept the "rights of man" within the Church. Now, the
Church has always condemned these declarations on the "rights of man"
which have been made against the authority of God.
The second betrayal was the
betrayal with the Protestants. It is Mgr.
Willebrands who was
entrusted in particular with the fostering of relations with the
Ecumenical Council of Churches in Geneva. He went to Geneva to make
peace with the Protestants, and the Protestants said to him, we can
make peace with you, we can all unite and work together, but you must
remove everything in the liturgy of the Church and in the concept of
the Church which does not agree with Protestant principles. Hence, the
whole liturgy and the whole structure of the Church was to be modified
and there was to be a new Canon Law to establish this new structure of
the Church and to put it into practice, a democratic structure. This
is what was then accomplished by Mgr.
Willebrands.
The third betrayal was
through Mgr. Willebrands
also, and Cardinal Bea,
through their meeting with delegates of
Moscow at Constantinople and also in
Greece, with
representatives of the Orthodox Church, the
Patriarch Pimen
of the Orthodox Church delegated by Moscow. What had to be done in
order to please the Communists? The Communists required that there
should be no condemnation of Communism at the Council, firstly;
secondly, that all the bishops opposed to the Communist regime should
be dismissed and replaced by collaborating bishops. Well, these
various requirements: Religious Liberty required by the Freemasons,
the changing of the whole interior and the Constitutions and the
liturgy of the Church by the Protestants; the non-condemnation of
Communism and the changing of the bishops by the Communists —all this
was agreed to and granted by the Church. The Church said yes, that's
all right, we accept Religious Liberty, and it was
Mgr. deSmedt, the Vice
President of the Secretariat for Christian Unity, who was the reporter
at the Council for the schema on Religious Liberty, together with
Cardinal Bea,
who was behind him and who supported him. Five times there was an
attempt to refuse this schema, five times they brought it back, and
finally they succeeded in having Religious Liberty passed.
|
In
referring to the same document, under the heading, The Truth that men
can't bear we read:
The outcome
of the schema on Religious Liberty was the infamous Nostra Aetate -
Declaration On The Relation Of The Church To Non-Christian Religions -
October 28, 1965
This
is the declaration that removed every condemnation against the Jews for
Perfidy (denial of Christ as Messiah) and Deicide and was the
basis for
the diabolically insane declaration by John Paul II that the Jews are
our elder brothers in the faith. It was also the base for the ongoing
Satanic syncretism of every form of paganism with the pseudo-Christ of
Assisi and all Apostate Ecumenical movements associated with that.
It
directly leads to the Antichrist.
The Catholic Church is the only thing which saves a
man from the degrading slavery of being a child of his age… GK
Chesterton
The voice is of Jacob, but the hands...they are
Esau's - Genesis 27:22
History of Man:
From bondage to spiritual faith
From spiritual faith to great courage
From courage to liberty
From liberty to abundance
From abundance to selfishness
From selfishness to complacency
From complacency to apathy
From apathy to dependency
From dependency back to bondage
Alexander Tytler
~~~~~~~
As with all
news sources, the discriminating reader should evaluate the veracity of
each item based upon its own merit. Other suggested relevant
resources (quotes,
references,
links
and
appendixes),
click
here>>>
Cf.
Date "idiot" was first used: some time
in the early 14th century. (references)
Etymology: Idiot \Id"i*ot\,
noun. [French expression idiot, from Latin expression idiota an
uneducated, ignorant, ill-informed person, Greek, also and originally,
private person, not holding public office, from proper, peculiar. See
Idiom.] (Websters 1913)
http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/idiot
Cf. “See," says Athanasius, “we are proving that this view has been
transmitted from Fathers to Fathers; but ye, modern Jews and disciples of
Caiaphas, whom can ye assign as Fathers to your phrases? Not one of the
understanding and wise, (for all abhor you) but the devil alone; none but
he is your father in this apostasy, who both in the beginning scattered on you
the seed of this irreligion, and now persuades you to slander the Ecumenical
Council for committing to writing, not your doctrines, but that which *
from the beginning those who were eye-witnesses and ministers of
the Word ' have handed down to us. For the faith which the Council has confessed
in writing, that is the faith of the Catholic Church; to assert this, the blessed
Fathers so expressed themselves while condemning the Arian heresy; and
this is a chief reason why these men apply themselves to calumniate the
Council. For it is not the terms which trouble them, but that those
terms prove them to be heretics, and presumptuous beyond other heresies.
" http://www.archive.org/stream/ra59764002athauoft/ra59764002athauoft_djvu.txt
|
5Unwrittenlines
