The Establishment

- The History of the New World Order –

16/2/2009

Part one

Prelude

I looked up in the dictionary the word Establishment [1]. It said:

A group of people holding most of the power and influence in a government or society.  Often used with “the.”  A controlling group in a given field of activity. Also: The church so recognized, esp. the Church of England.   

In reading the above statement, it comes to mind that the Church of England, as an English Establishment, was historically the fruit of the Reformation. 

I also looked up the word Reformation[2]. It said:

1. The act of reforming; state of being reformed.

2. (initial capital letter) the religious movement in the 16th century that had for its object the reform of the Roman Catholic Church, and that led to the establishment of the Protestant churches. 

According to my historical sources, this last statement is not exactly correct.  However, I’ll come back to that later.

Introduction

Often when things don’t go well, people say: “It is the system, you know.”  But what is wrong with system?  Is it the government, or the church, or the banks or other causes?

People don’t have an answer to those questions; and they don’t want to know, for it is painful to discover that the very people who are supposedly looking after your best interests are cheating you blind. 

For many centuries, that is, from the reign of Constantine up to the 16th century, the Catholic Church was recognized as the valid Establishment on earth and no other institution was there to challenge that fact. 

However since the 16th century - when King Henry VIII became the head of the Church of England in 1529[3] - the Catholic Church was challenged as the Establishment in the western world. Subsequently, in the 20^th century after Vatican II, the Catholic Church lost even this secondary position.

Chapter 1

Reformation: a Political Act

As I said, reformation started with King Henry VIII when the English parliament made him the head of the Church of England.  Consequently all properties that belonged to the Catholic Church, such as land and buildings with their gold and silver ornaments, were seized by the nobility and their cohort of ruffians who enriched themselves at the expense of the Catholic Church and the vast majority of the poor, who were then Catholic. 

Thus Reformation was not exactly, “the religious movement in the 16th century that had for its object the reform of the Roman Catholic Church, and that led to the establishment of the Protestant churches,” but rather it was the political movement that had for its object the reform of the state of affairs between King Henry VIII and his parliament, i.e., from being Catholic to becoming the Anglican – that is protestant - establishment. 

In other words, Reformation was a political act by the English Parliament and had nothing whatsoever to do with religion.[4]

Reformation was the new door, which would give access to the creation of a new institution, namely, the Commonwealth or British Establishment – known later on in the 19^th and 20^th centuries as the Anglo-American Establishment. 

Therefore, through the seizure of the property of the Catholic Church, the Catholic gentry and commoners - the few recusants[5] who kept the Catholic faith of their fathers – the nouveaux riches gradually took control of the country, so weakening the power of throne, that is, by controlling it from behind.  This happened especially since the creation of the East India Company[6] in 1600, and the Bank of England, in 1694.[7]  

The East India Company

John Coleman, in his book, “The Committee of 300[8],” describes cogently how a well selected group of nouveaux riches, or New Millionaires, owed their position to the loot of the Church lands and clerical wealth of all kinds.[9]  In other words, a new elite came on the scene, who first enriched themselves and then contributed to the changing of England from a provincial, or nondescript country to an empire which lasted over three centuries, until the middle of the 20^th century.  

The new elite

A few names might help us to illustrate the development of the British Establishment.  After King Henry VIII dismissed Cardinal Wolsey as the Lord Chancellor of England and replaced him[10] with Thomas Cranmer, there was a further step towards to the creation of  the British Establishment.  

Then we have William Cecil, later called Baron Burghley[11] who was the real power behind the throne of Queen Elizabeth I.  Elizabeth could do nothing without the consent of William Cecil[12] who was in fact, apart from other evils, a rabid anti-Catholic even before her reign.  Then there were, among the executioners of Catholic recusants, Richard Young. William Wade and, the worst of his kind[13] Richard Topcliffe. 

Next we have Thomas Cromwell,[14] the duke of Norfolk (Cromwell’s arch-enemy[15]) and finally Oliver Cromwell and the Jews[16], most of whose forefathers had been expelled from England in 1290, but came from Holland under the Cromwellian Protectorate in 1656.  

Thus William Cecil, Thomas Cranmer, Thomas Gresham, who opened the Royal Exchange in London making it the financial capital of the world, Martin Frobisher, who established trade in 1555 with Russia, the pirate Sir Francis Drake,[17] among many other historical figures - and the Jews, of course, who took part in the total dismantling of the Catholic Church in England - were the backbone of the British Establishment, They were joined early in the 20^th century by their American counterparts, thus becoming known as the Anglo-American Establishment.

Chapter 2

Commonwealth

Although Wikipedia says that the Commonwealth is the successor of the British Empire,[18] it seems there was a commonwealth predecessor of the British Empire.

The Anglo-American Establishment

So from the initial British Establishment of the old days, in February 1891 a group of people, which combined offspring from the old generation of anti-Catholics and some from the new world, arose on the world scene to establish a new world order.  In “The Anglo-American Establishment,” Carroll Quigley writes:

 And here Phyllis Schlafly[21], in The Phyllis Schlafly Report (April 1971) when Carroll Quigley was still living, comments descriptively on what he wrote in his book, “Tragedy and Hope” regarding the Anglo-American Establishment:

The Anglo-American Establishment may disguise itself under appearance of humanitarian organizations, like Rotary[22], United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF),  United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC); or as a religious organization like World Council of Churches [WCC], the Unification Church ( the Moonies[23]) etcetera.  However, what all these organizations have in common is the promotion of the New World Order, or better still One World Government. 

The creation of One World Government has been in the making for a long time, in particular since the establishment of the United Nations in 1945 – the offspring of the former League of Nations[24].

The United Nations [Commonwealth Votes at the UN]

The United Nations is a creature of the internationalists – that is, members of the Anglo-American establishment - such as the Rockefellers, and J. P. Morgan Sr[25] and the British Royal Family.  Also, William T. Still in “New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies, states (page 173): 

Those names are the same who collaborated with the former Soviet Union.  In other words, Communism was the brainchild of the Anglo-American Establishment,[26] as is the United Nations from its inception.   

To recap what has been written so far: The British Reformation has been the trigger for the devastation of the Catholic Church in England, which was supplanted by the British Establishment, with its East India Company and the Bank of England [and other major private commercial companies.  Later on in the early 20^th century, the British Establishment, after the American internationalists joined in, became known as the Anglo-American Establishment [for short, ‘the Establishment’] to the present day of this writing.  And finally the United Nations, with its affiliate network, such as International Monetary Found [IMF], and World Bank,[27] are the creatures of the Establishment. 

Needless to say, every government on this planet - directly or indirectly - is at least influenced, if not controlled [as are the USA and Australia[28]], by the Establishment.   

To simplify, the Establishment today means: insurance companies, central banks and government.[29] I mention insurance companies, because since globalization[30] began,[31] particularly in the last twenty years, people say there is nothing one can do, either of a non-profit or a commercial nature, without paying insurance, in case some litigation might incurred. My foot!  

Pressure to be insured for something which might happen is a scare tactic by the government, in league with the insurance companies, to enrich themselves at the expenses of the populace.  It is a political stunt with its ultimate agenda being total control over people, One World Government.   

Now one may ask: Who control the controllers? 

Follow the money trail and you might discover that the same people who helped Oliver Cromwell to power in England, in the 17^th century, are still today pulling the strings right at the center of the Establishment. 

To part two, click here>>>

To part three, click here>>>

============

Notes

The emerging global government…http://www.tldm.org/news5/emerging.htm

Occult Theocracy! By Mark S. Watson

People are shocked when they discover that is was British and American financial interests that funded Lenin when communism first started out.  They are appalled to discover that Trotsky and Lenin were guests of some of the most powerful financial interests in America just prior to the Bolshevik revolution, that they received large amounts of money from these interests.

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/occult_theocracy.htm

American Babylon - Rise and Fall -  Part 4: A One World Vision, New York City, and the CFR

Cecil Rhodes and the One World Agenda
The Council for Global Domination
The CFR and the New York Financial Oligarchy
The CFR Creates the Postwar World

http://www.redmoonrising.com/AmericanBabylon/Part4.htm- www.redmoonrising.com 

Carrol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, pp 1249-1278, The Future in Perspective,  http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/future.htm 

Carroll Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment: http://mailstar.net/quigley.html

 Steven Yates, "Taking the Red Pill" The Real Matrix, Part 2

http://www.newswithviews.com/Yates/steven1.htm 

Other Western Élites - The World Central Bank: The Bank for International Settlements http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm 

Shadow Government

The Round Table Groups have already been mentioned in this book several times, notably in connection with the formation of the British Commonwealth in chapter 4 and in the discussion of appeasement in chapter 12 ("the Cliveden Set").  http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/shadow/tragedyandhope.htm

Joan Veon: The Power of The British Commonwealth Over The World [history, from a feminist point of view, Ed.] http://www.rense.com/general62/britt.htm 

Skull & Bones & Bush

[...]

"Jan 19 (EIRNS)--An obscure secret society known as "Skull and Bones" may have more to do with George Bush's obsessive support of Beijing's mass murderers than one may think.

[..]

"George Bush, the first U.S. diplomatic representative to the People's Republic of China back in 1973, was a member of Skull and Bones. So were his father, brother, son, uncle, nephew, and several cousins. Winston Lord, the Reagan-Bush administration Ambassador to China was a member; so were his father and several other relatives. James Lilley, the current Ambassador to China, was a member of Skull and Bones, as was his brother.  Except during the Carter administration, every U.S. Ambassador to Beijing since Kissinger's deal with Mao Zedong was a member of the same tiny Yale cult.  A mere coincidence? 

"MAO WAS A YALIE - Back in 1903, Yale Divinity School established a number of schools and hospitals throughout China that were collectively known as 'Yale in China.' It has since been shown that 'Yale in China' was an intelligence network whose purpose was to destroy the republican movement of Sun Yat-sen on behalf of the Anglo-American Establishment. The Anglo-American "Establishment" hated Sun, because he wanted to develop China. On the other hand, they loved the Chinese communists because they intended to keep China backward, and were committed to growing dope. One of 'Yale in China's' most important students was Mao Zedong. http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/evils/politics/X0002_BUSHED.TXT.html or here: http://www.illuminati-news.com/S&B-China.htm 

Red Symphony, by Dr. J. Landowsky; translated by George Knupffer -  http://mailstar.net/red-symphony.html 

Books: 

Maurice Pinay: Plot Against The Church.

Carroll Quigley: Tragedy And Hope - A History of the World in Our Time - A definitive treatise expounding 'one world' government.  

Carroll Quigley: The Anglo-American Establishment - Provides crucial 'linkage' to understanding 20th century political, economical, and military phenomena.  

Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy. 

William T. Stills New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies.  

Th

Protestant Reformation by William Cobbett

http://www.exclassics.com/protref/prot1.htm or her: http://www.exclassics.com/protref/prot16.htm