|
Fatima
“Consecration of Russia”:
As our Lady requested at Fatima
17/3/2009
Preface
A river of ink has been spent on the subject of “The
Consecration of Russia”
by both Catholic and secular press alike since the event of July 13,
1917 at Fatima. Initially, the subject left me cold. I did not think
that its significance should be undermined; neither did I think it worth
much attention. Later I changed my attitude.
It was the word “Russia” per se that got
me in.
Introduction
In The Fatima Network
we read:
|
In
the apparition of July 13, Our Lady warned the three seers that if
people did not stop offending God, He would punish the world "by means
of war, hunger and persecution of the Church and of the Holy Father,"
using Russia
as His chosen instrument of chastisement.
[...]
"I
shall come to ask for the Consecration of
Russia
to My Immaculate Heart...If people attend to My requests,
Russia
will be converted and the world will have peace."
|
Along the same lines, another
Fatima Network
document, Frequently Asked Questions
regarding the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary,
says:
|
As
Our Lady told Sister Lucy at Fatima: “Russia
will be the instrument of chastisement chosen by Heaven to punish the
whole world if we do not beforehand obtain the
conversion
of that poor nation ...”
 And
as Sister Lucy disclosed in her published memoirs and letters, Our
Lord Himself confided to her that He would not
convert Russia unless the
consecration were done, “Because I want My whole Church to recognize
that consecration as a triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, so
that it may extend its cult later on, and put the devotion to this
Immaculate Heart beside the devotion to My Sacred Heart.” Sister Lucy
has explained that because Russia
is a well-defined territory, the
conversion of Russia
after its consecration to the Immaculate Heart would be undeniable
proof that the conversion
resulted from the consecration and nothing else. |
“Consecration” and only then “conversion” of “Russia”
- essentially what do they mean? Shouldn’t we try to find out what our
Lady really meant by the word “Russia?” {For
updated, please, see at the bottom page:
FATIMA}
Now, the problem is that most Catholic people think
that when our Lady said Russia, Russia as a country must been understood.
Part One
Now, before going to the heart of the problem, let us
examine this subject closely.
Russian Revolution
The first question that comes to mind is this: Was it
a mere coincidence that our Lady appeared to the three seers in 1917, the
same year as the Russian Revolution?
My belief is that there is no such thing as
coincidence. That was good timing. In history, Jesus Christ was
Emanuel, God with us. He came among us in the fullness of time, the
perfect time, neither too early nor too late, for our salvation. Signs
from Heaven - always apt, and in the fullness of time - are for the
faithful people who live in this world, to see and understand according to
the divine wisdom given them by the Spirit of God.
Unfortunately, though, the request of our Lady was not
heeded by the hierarchy of Catholic Church according to the wisdom of the
Spirit of God, but according to the spirit of this world, namely, Satan.
Our Lady gave the seers at Fatima three secrets and
told them that the Pope should reveal the third secret before 1960. Pope
Pius XII died in 1958. Pope John XXIII succeeded him and died in 1963
without revealing the secret. Six consecutive popes, from Pius XII to the
present Benedict XVI, have failed to disclose the third secret of Fatima
to the world. Why did the Popes refuse her requests to disclose the
secret? The reasons for this grave omission will be here outlined.
Russia and Communism
I believe that our Lady when using the word, ‘Russia’
had in mind, rather than a geographic
region on the map, a particularly influential and powerful group of
people who resided in Russia. These people are the ones who
were planning to destroy Christianity starting in Russia as a satellite,
thus establishing Communism in Russia from where it would spread
throughout the world.
Historically, Communism was the brainchild of
the French Revolution.
Communism in Russia was achieved by
slaughtering tens of millions of Christians and plundering their
possessions.
But who are these people who planned the
destruction of Christianity in Russia? Aren’t these people not Russian
too? They had originated in or near Russia but they have seen themselves
as distinct from the Russian people, having no common heritage as far as
religion or culture is concerned. They are, in fact, those who
today go by the name “Jews”.
Self-styled “Jews”
You may ask, “Why, then, did our Lady not use the word
‘Jews’ instead of ‘Russia’?” My answer to that question is: our Lady could
not use the word ‘Jews’ because the people commonly called and calling
themselves them “Jews” are not truly Jews.
No doubt many people are going to accuse me of being
‘anti-Semitic” or ‘anti-Jewish.’ I call that a
red herring, any way, and I don’t care,
because truth has to come out. I would like to say, however, that my
Catholic religion taught me to love everybody, even my enemies.
What we know (or think we know) about them today is
almost all wrong. As Napoleon
once said:
'History is a set of
agreed-upon lies.'
Also
Michel Foucault said:
History has been written by the victors.
For this reason, history books today
should be rewritten, for much that has been written in those texts is
biased, if not entirely false.
So if these people whom we call “Jews” are not Jews
then what are they?
Khazars
These people are descendents of the Khazars and
not of Semitic origin. The Wikipedia entry for ‘Khazars’ says:
|
The
Khazars were a semi-nomadic Turkic people who dominated the Pontic
steppe and the North Caucasus from the 7th to the 10th century CE. The
name 'Khazar' seems to be tied to a Turkic verb form meaning
"wandering".
In
the 7th century
CE, the Khazars founded an independent Khaganate in the
Northern Caucasus along the
Caspian Sea. Although the Khazars were initially Tengri shamanists,
many of them converted to Christianity, Islam, and other religions.
During the 8th or 9th century the state religion
became Judaism.
At their height, the Khazar khaganate and its tributaries controlled
much of what is today southern Russia,
western Kazakhstan, eastern Ukraine, Azerbaijan, large portions of the
Northern Caucasus (Circassia, Dagestan, Chechnya), parts of Georgia
and the Crimea. |
Benjamin Freedman,
who converted and ceased calling himself a “Jew”, wrote the following:
|
It is
an incontestable fact that the word "Jew" did not come into existence
until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word "Jew" did not exist in any
language. The word "Jew" was introduced into the English for the first
time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play "The
Rivals", II,i, "She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a
Jew". Prior to this use of the word "Jew" in the English language by
Sheridan in
1775 the word "Jew" had not become a word in the English language.
Shakespeare never saw the word "Jew" as you will see. Shakespeare
never used the word "Jew" in any of his works, the common general
belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his "Merchant of Venice",
V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: "what is the reason? I am a
Iewe, hath not a Iewe eyes?" |
But Benjamin Freedman,
in another of his documents,
Facts Are Facts – II,
gives us a better account of the history of Khazars:
|
The Khazars were not
"Semites."
They were an Asiatic Mongoloid nation.
They are classified by modern anthropologists as Turco-Finns racially.
From time immemorial the homeland of the Khazars was in the heart of
Asia. They were a very warlike nation. The Khazars were driven out
of Asia finally by the nations in
Asia with
whom they were continually at war. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe
to escape further defeats in Asia. The very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue
and conquer the 25 peaceful agricultural nations occupying
approximately 1,000,000 square miles in eastern Europe. In a
comparatively short period the Khazars established the largest and
most powerful kingdom in
Europe, and probably the wealthiest also.
The
Khazars were a pagan nation when they invaded eastern Europe. Their
religious worship was a mixture of phallic worship and other forms of
idolatrous worship practiced in Asia by pagan nations. This form of
worship continued until the 7th century. The vile forms of sexual excess indulged in by the Khazars as their
form of religious worship produced a degree of moral degeneracy the
Khazar's king could not endure. In the 7th century King Bulan
… decided to abolish the practice of phallic worship and other forms
of idolatrous worship and make one of the three monotheistic
religions, about which he knew very little, the new state religion.
After a historic session with representatives of the three
monotheistic religions King Bulan
decided against Christian and Islam and selected as the future state
religion the religious worship then know as "Talmudism,"
and now known and practiced as "Judaism."
This even is well documented in history. |
When Talmudic Judaism became the Khazars’ new
religion, their Yiddish tongue still being an unwritten language,
they adopted the Hebrew alphabet for their script.
Part Two
The Yiddish language
Contrary to what many historians have written
concerning to the Yiddish language, Benjamin
Freedman, in Facts Are
Facts – III,
stated:
|
Since the conquest of the Khazars by the Russians and the
disappearance of the Khazar Kingdom the language of the Khazars is
known as Yiddish.
For about six centuries the so-called or self-styled "Jews" of eastern
Europe have referred to themselves while still resident in their
native eastern European countries as "Yiddish"
by nationality. They identified themselves as "Yiddish"
rather than as Russian, Polish, Galatian, Lithuanian, Rumanian,
Hungarian or by the nation of which they were citizens. They also
referred to the common language they all spoke as "Yiddish".
There are today in New York City as you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein,
many "Yiddish" newspapers,
"Yiddish" theaters, and many other cultural
organizations of so-called or self-styled "Jews" from eastern Europe
which are identified publicly by the word "Yiddish"
in their title.
[....]
The
"Yiddish"
language is not a German dialect. Many people are led to believe so
because "Yiddish" has borrowed so many words from the German language.
If "Yiddish" is a German dialect
acquired from the Germans then what language did the Khazars speak for
1000 years they existed in eastern Europe before they acquired culture
from the Germans? The Khazars must have spoken some language when they
invaded eastern Europe. What was that language? When did they discard
it? How did the entire Khazar population discard one language and
adopt another all of a sudden? The idea is too absurd to discuss.
"Yiddish" is
the modern name for the ancient mother-tongue of the Khazars with
added German, Slavonic and Baltic adopted and adapted numerous words. |
Thus with their own exclusive Yiddish language using
the Hebrew script - and their adopted religion, Talmudism - they now
identified themselves as a unique group of people with a messianic mission
to conquer the world.
There is nothing, which will
unite people, more powerfully than their own exclusive language.
What the Hebrew language was for the ancient Israelites of the Old
Testament, Yiddish today is for the self-styled ‘Jews.’
The Roman Empire had Latin as their
national language. Thanks to that the Empire survived around about two
thousand years. The Catholic Church adopted Latin as her
ecclesiastic language and she survived for two thousand years till, in the
aftermath of Vatican II, the Latin language languished first, and later
disappeared, from Catholic universities and seminaries. No wonder then,
that the Catholic Church has lost the plot today.
The self-style ‘Jews’ have Yiddish as their
secular language - and Hebrew, of course, as their sacred language, which
gives them prestige, as “the chosen people of the Old Testament.”
You may ask, “Why give so much emphasis to Yiddish
language?”
Dear Reader, bear with me a bit longer and you will
see why an exclusive language, such as Yiddish, is so important to a
particular group of people, or better still to a nation.
Tower of Babel
Going back in history, the story of the Tower of
Babel speaks volumes about how a civilization ceased to be, once a
common language stopped being spoken among people of the same culture.
The Bible tells us, once God confused the people’s language, disorder and
dispersion followed.
No longer a People, therefore no longer a great Nation.
But what has this to do with Fatima? The explanation
in regard to the Yiddish language is only a preliminary to what I wish to
say.
Fatima
As I said, our Lady spoke at Fatima in the same year
as the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution was
instigated mainly by the so-called ‘Jews’,
or rather the descendents of the Khazars who, after they lost their
kingdom in the East of Europe, were scattered to the four corners of the
earth.
To put it another way, Our Lady when she said:
"I shall come to ask for the Consecration of
Russia to My Immaculate Heart”
she pointed out that, once the “Jews” have been consecrated
to Her, peace on earth would be established. However, that was not to
be. Why?
Part Three
Our Lady knew the threat to Russian Christianity and
culture; she knew that Russia would be only the first of many nations to
come to grief if these people had their way. She knew the threat to the
Church and the danger to the faith that would befall all Christians.
Since the death, in 1958, of Pope Pius XII and
subsequent election of his successor, Angelo Roncalli, as Pope John XXIII,
the Catholic Church made a drastic U turn from her two thousand
year apostolic tradition.
Not only was the Latin language rejected, and
replaced by the vulgate, that is the secular
and national language; but the Vatican made a secret pact was with
her deadly enemy, Communism: The
Pact of Metz.
On the Catholic Tradition website, an article, by the
title, “Fatima: The Vatican Moscow Agreement,” states:
|
[...]
Our Lady of Fatima requested
that the Pope in union with the world's bishops consecrate Russia to
the Immaculate Heart of Mary, promising Her triumph and a period of
peace as the result. The Pact of
Metz, otherwise known as
the Vatican-Moscow Agreement has been the main obstacle to the Popes'
performing this consecration---a consecration that would have caused
the conversion of Russia and would have prevented the present scandals
the Church now suffers. |
It is crystal clear to this writer that, since the
Pact of Metz, the Communist philosophy, in the guise of renewal [read:
Modernism] became part of the Vatican II agenda.
I know that it is hard for a devout Catholic to accept
this fact; it is just too painful. Furthermore, the implications of such
a wicked deed are unlimited.
But why was this Pact of Metz secret and what
are its implications?
It was done secretly because Communism had been
condemned numerous times by the Magisterium and the Popes.
The implications of tacit acceptance of Communism by Vatican II, are the
total submission of the Catholic Church to the interests of the
self-styled Jews [and of course Israel].
“But where is the proof?” one may ask. Here are some
historical facts, which will substantiate these serious allegations.
1. The Jews were the founders of Communism and
subsequently the promoters of the Russian Revolution.
Please read what Brother
Nathanael Kapner, himself a former Zionist, has to say in
regard to Communism and the Russian Revolution in this excerpt from his
website, Real Jew News, in
Confessions Of An Anti-Zionist Journalist:
|
Later,
in my adult years as an Orthodox Christian, I came to understand that
nearly 50 million Russian Orthodox Christians were
murdered by Bolshevik Jews
during the communist takeover of Czarist Russia and
subsequently under both Lenin & Stalin.
|
During the Vatican II sessions,
Pope Paul VI visited Jerusalem
for the first time in 1964.
The pope’s visit was only an appetizer for what would come next on the
Catholic Church’s plate.
United Nations
On 4th October 1965, twenty days after the
close of Vatican II, Pope Paul VI, during his visit to the United
Nations, made a speech in which he said: “L'organisation des nations
unies c'est institution mondiale pour la paix et la collaboration entre
les peuples de toute la terre”;
in English, “The United Nations is a World Institution for peace
and collaboration between the peoples of the entire world.”
Was it just coincidence that, only three weeks after
the close of Vatican II, Pope Paul VI made that speech? Hardly!
Remember, reader, in a similar vein, during his 5th
October 1995 visit, Pope John Paul II
praised the UN:
In
coming before this distinguished Assembly, I am vividly aware that
through you I am in some way addressing the whole family of peoples
living on the face of the earth. My words are meant as a sign of the
interest and esteem of the Apostolic See and of the Catholic Church for
this Institution. They echo the voices of all those who see in the
United Nations the hope of a better future for human society.
And
this writer in The Ploy - Calling Things by Wrong
Names
has pointed out:
|
We have not a
few instances that show how well this messianic role of
liberator has been taken up by the United Nations today. Just
look at Afghanistan, Iraq and the Palestinians - especially at the
time of this writing, in the Gaza strip. Those are but just a few
examples among several others around the world. However, the
United Nations is not the messiah some people expected it
to be. It is a ploy.
The United
Nations …. is allowing the massacre of hundreds of thousands of
innocent people around the world, by Israel, the U. S., the U. K. and
their “coalition of the willing” to continue unimpeded. Of
course, once the name of International Community is attached to
any institution, such as is in this case, the United Nations, whatever
it does must be right, people think.
|
Nostra Aetate
Finally, with the proclamation by
Pope Paul VI, on October 28, 1965,
of the Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian
Religions, doors which for centuries were closed to the Jews [Judaics]
have been now opened to them.
Conversion of the “Jews”
With the declaration, Nostra Aetate, the
progress of the Jewish intrusion into Vatican affairs is expedited. Since
then – for forty-four years now – the Catholic Church did a U-turn, so
that the apostolic mandate to evangelize all nations, especially the Jews,
is “no longer theologically acceptable in the Catholic Church...”
Delegates from the United States Conference of
Catholic Bishops’ Committee for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs
published “Reflections on Covenant and Mission” which states:
|
"A deepening
Catholic appreciation of the eternal covenant between God and the
Jewish people, together with a recognition of a divinely-given mission
to Jews to witness to God's faithful love, lead to the conclusion that
campaigns that target Jews for conversion to Christianity are no
longer theologically acceptable in the Catholic Church." |
It goes without saying that, if Jews today are no
longer to be converted by the Church, Russia cannot be consecrated to our
Lady, as She has requested at Fatima, because they [Russia & Jews] are one
and the same thing.
Conclusion
Thanks to “Aggiornamento,” or renewal, by Vatican II,
the new church has turned its back to the true Church’s two thousand years
of Apostolic Tradition, thus submitting itself,
not to the will of our Lord Jesus Christ, but to the will of the
self-styled Jews with their cabal of rabbis.
Consequently, the request of our Lady at Fatima for
the “consecration and conversion of Russia” [i.e., of the “Jews”] has
become a dead letter.
It is obvious to anyone with a Catholic sense that the
new church has chosen the easy way which leads to perdition.
Why? For fear of the Jews.
The consequences for the new church in taking the
easy way are discouraging to say the least, because in Matthew
7:13 we read: Enter ye in at the narrow
gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to
destruction, and many there are who go in thereat.
And or concerning the self-styled Jews, our Lord in
Revelation 2:9, says:"I
know the blasphemy of those who say they are jews, and are not, but are
the synagogue of satan."
Maranatha
Nadir Martello
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Similar documents, click
here:
I;
II;
III;
IV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bibliography
Books:
Maurice Pinay: The Plot Against the Church
Rev. Denis Fahey: The Rulers of Russia
Cardinal Of Chile: “The Mystery of Freemasonry
Unveiled” – [with encyclical, Humanum Genus].
Jack Berstein: The Life of an American Jew in
Racist Marxist Israel
Vicomte Leon De Poncins:
Judaism and the Vatican
Arthur Koestler: The Thirteenth Tribe
Henry Ford Sr.: The International Jew
B. Jensen: The Palestine Plot
Theodore Winston Pike: Israel our Duty...Our
Dilemma
Michael Hoffman: Judaism Discovered
·
Who are the Jews?- 838
·
Moses Hess and the secret Revelation between
·
Judaism, Zionism and Communism – 853
·
Misnamed “Jews”
Are not the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob –
891.
Notes
The people who call themselves jews most
definitely are NOT Judeans. The
people who call themselves jews, are NOT Hebrews. They are not
Israelites. And they are clearly not Semites. They have absolutely no
ethnic, racial, or religious connection to the Holy Land.
They are an Asiatic Mongol tribe known as the
Khazars, who converted to Babylonian talmudism, (the precursor of judaism)
in the seventh century A.D. (Some Biblical scholars think they are the
people from the land of Gog and Magog. Sound familiar?)
To further the confusion they refer to
themselves as Ashkenazi jews.
{from anonymous:
March 11, 2009 1:22 AM
}
1) Updated:
Newchurch Covers up Polish Clergy's Complicity with
Communism
Newvatican Whitewash "Investigation" Is Placed under Cloak of Secrecy
From: The Fathers
It seems these days that Newchurch engages in historical
revision whenever it wants to make something up. Documents in Poland's
National Memorial Library, which were opened to the public after the fall
of the Communist regime in 1989, showed that primarily after Vatican II
(1962-1965), up to one out of every five Newchurch bishops, including
possibly Karol Woytyla (later to become John Paul II), and presbyters
signed contracts to spy for the Communist Secret Police for payoffs. Yet a
statement has been issued by Poland's Newchurch Bishops' Conference that
Newvatican has "cleared them."
But the Newchurch bishops' attempt to whitewash their
spying for atheistic Communism was exposed on March 12, 2009, by the
Gazeta Polska newspaper, which published the information that
Newvatican had examined only a small number of documents purged of
incriminating evidence by the Polish bishops themselves, not on the
complete documents maintained in the National Memorial Library.
http://www.traditio.com/comment/com0903.htm
2) Updated:
on Communism
COMMUNISM and The Evolution of the “Errors of Russia”
Solange Hertz
http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/archive-communism_hertz.htm
and here:
http://home.earthlink.net/~margand/_wsn/page3.html.
|
5Unwrittenlines
