Apostasy of the Church:
The cat is out of the bag
2/3/2009
|
The children
also of Memphis, and of Taphnes have deflowered thee, even to the
crown of the head. Hath not this been done to thee, because thou hast
forsaken the Lord thy God at that time, when he led thee by the way?
And now what hast thou to do in the way of Egypt, to drink the
troubled water? And what hast thou to do with the way of the
Assyrians, to drink the water of the river?
Thy own wickedness shall reprove thee, and thy apostasy shall rebuke
thee. Know thou, and see that it is an evil and a bitter thing for
thee, to have left the Lord thy God, and that my fear is not with
thee, saith the Lord the God of hosts. Of old time thou hast broken
my yoke, thou hast burst my bands, and thou
saidst: I will not serve. For on every high hill, and under every
green tree thou didst prostitute thyself. (Jeremias
2:16-20)
And the woman was
clothed round about with purple and scarlet, and gilt with gold, and
precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand, full of
the abomination and filthiness of her fornication. (Apocalypse 17:4) |
Prelude
About forty years ago, at
the monthly meeting of the catechists and inspectors in the district of
Fort Carnot, Madagascar, this writer asked the participants
the following question: “What would you
do if the great bulk
of the Catholic Church, that is, priests,
bishops, cardinals including the Pope would one day give up their faith in
the Lord Jesus Christ?”
For what seemed like a long
time, no one in the room spoke. Finally, one of the inspectors said: “As
for myself, I would leave the Church”.
I never forgot that fatal
statement, because its resonance is still with me today. What was spoken
as a hypothetical case actually happens today as I write: the
apostasy in the Catholic Church is factual.
Chapter one
I know that what I am going
to say will upset most Catholic people. That won’t stop me telling what I
know and believe to be true. It’s also true, nowadays, that among church
people it is more important to keep up appearances, even in a plain
heresy, than to live for the truth, which is
Jesus Christ Himself, regardless of the consequences.
To live for the truth
means, not only to hold steadfast the central tenets of Christian faith,
that is, Jesus’ death on the cross, His Resurrection and bodily ascension
of our Lord Jesus Christ, but also to defend the faith against all
falsehood and heresy. The Church today is no longer doing this.
The
Bishop Richard Williamson
affair is a case in point that illustrates quite clearly where and to whom
Vatican loyalty belongs.
Bishop Williamson
is one of four prelates of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) illicitly
ordained to the episcopate by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1988. On 21
January 2009, Benedict XVI lifted the excommunications of the four
bishops, causing uproar among Jewish leaders.
Thanks to the vast publicity given by Big Media, the Society’s status
changed overnight from an obscure institution to a most controversial one
within and without the Catholic Church.
Pandora’s Box
The Bishop Williamson
affair opened a Pandora’s Box, revealing
all the evils ... her urn that containing blessings and evils bestowed
upon Mankind.
Am I saying that the
Catholic Church allegiance is no longer to the Gospel and therefore to her
Lord Jesus Christ? You, reader, will judge for yourself.
The fact is that never
before has any Pope stated, as Pope Benedict XVI did on 13th
February 2009, that “to deny or minimize in
any way the holocaust is a crime against God and against humanity,
especially on the part of those who follow Sacred Scripture.”
Now, why was such a
declaration made publicly?
It was vital for Pope
Benedict XVI to do so, because, after the excommunication was lifted from
the SSPX bishops, it was necessary to appease (if such a thing were
possible) the whole Jewish establishment which
had raised a hue and cry over the mending of bridges with (according to
the media) “a traditional, pre-Vatican, schismatic, right-wing group”.
Why?
Because anybody who
dares to question the new ‘dogma’ that six million Jews died at the hands
of the Nazi regime during World War II attacks the new Judaist religion of
‘Holocaustianity’.
Holocaustianity is one of
main tenets of Zionism on which the State of Israel was created and
still stands. Thus questioning the holocaust is
the same as questioning the reason for the existence of the State of
Israel.
Now the holocaust is to the
Jewish Establishment what the Crucifixion of our Lord is to the Catholic
Church. Nowadays, the cross is being supplanted by the holocaust in
the post Vatican II Church. That is
apostasy.
For sometime now, Christian
symbols, such as the Ten Commandments,
the cross and the crucifix, have been banned from public buildings in
Europe and elsewhere.
However, the menorah – a
symbol of Judaism and the emblem of Israel
– is allowed. And public schools, where the Christian faith is seldom
allowed to be taught, allow rabbis to teach the holocaust
and Judaism, which is Talmudism.
Holocaust the new
religion
Today Christianity seems to have one foot in the grave
and the other on a banana skin; if not yet dead, it is in jeopardy of
being eclipsed by the holocaust, or rather Holocaustianity. Yes,
Holocaustianity is the religion of our modern times and everybody has to
bow or bend the knee to it, as to the golden calf of the
ancient days.
“But that’s ridiculous,” you may say. But is it?
Today, anybody can blaspheme God, Jesus Christ, Mary His Mother
and the Saints, with impunity. However, if anyone publicly questions the
holocaust he may get years of prison, like Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf,
David Irving, and Fredrick Töben, among others.
Here is what this document, What’s
the Big Deal about the Holocaust? said
in regard to Bishop Williamson:
|
Jew Thought Police,
like the ADL’s Abe Foxman went haywire about it, demanded and had the
spineless Vatican denounce his comments and remove him from the
pulpit. World Jewish leaders then told the Vatican that “Holocaust
denial is not an opinion, but a crime.” Jews ordered them to declare
Holocaust denial as “heresy” and undergo Holocaust education. |
According to Reuters 20-2-2009:
Argentina has given Bishop Richard
Williamson, who denies the extent of the Holocaust, ten days to
leave the country or else he will be expelled.
|
Bishop Richard
Williamson, an ultra-traditionalist who headed a seminary near Buenos
Aires until earlier this month, has said he believes there were no gas
chambers and that no more than 300,000 Jews died in Nazi concentration
camps, rather than the 6 million figure that is widely accepted by
historians.
The Vatican has ordered him to retract his comments. Williamson has
said in response he needs more time to review the evidence.
"The interior minister. . . orders Richard Nelson Williamson to leave
the country within 10 days or be expelled," said a statement issued by
the government.
Pope Benedict angered Jewish leaders and progressive Catholics last
month when he lifted excommunications on the bishop, Richard
Williamson, and three other traditionalists to try to heal a
20-year-old schism within the Church.
Williamson, who is British-born, was removed earlier this month from
the head of La Reja seminary on the outskirts of the Argentine
capital. |
Thus, if Holocaustianity has become de facto a new
teaching of the Catholic Faith – a contradiction in terms – endorsed by
the Vatican, the apostasy of the Catholic Church is a reality.
For the Apostle Paul wrote in Galatians 1:8-9:
|
But though
we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which
we have preached to you, let him be anathema.
As we said
before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides
that which you have received, let him be anathema.
|
But, how has all this came about?
Development of Apostasy
The apostasy of the Catholic Church developed in six
main stages over the last fifty years:
1. The 1962 Pact of Metz between the Soviet
Union and the Vatican.
2. The Second Vatican Council, 1962-65.
3. Nostra Aetate,
or Declaration on the Relation of
the Church to Non-Christian Religions,
proclaimed by Pope Paul VI on October 28, 1965.
4. The Relationship
between the Vatican and the United Nations.
5. The Novus Ordo Missae,
promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1969,
which usurped the status of the
Traditional Latin Mass.
6. The recognition by the
Vatican of the State of Israel in 1993.
(1)
The
1962"Pact
of Metz"
between the Communist Soviet Union and Vatican
Some time back, I searched
for the word ‘Communism’ in the Documents of Vatican II but could not find
it. Then I looked in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and couldn’t
find it there either. “That is odd,” I thought.
Later I discovered why the
word ‘Communism’ was in neither book: it was done deliberately by a
"fifth column"
within the
Vatican which has far-reaching
control over
Vatican affairs since 1958.
In my extensive reading on
the Catholic Church, I discovered that prior to Vatican II the Church had
made a pact with her principal enemy, Communism, which had been condemned
by the 19th and 20th century Popes.
In his article,
“The Pact of Metz,” Atila Sinke
Guimarães writes:
|
Why
didn’t the last Ecumenical Council condemn Communism? A secret accord
made at Metz supplies an answer.
Those who
pass by the convent of the Little Sisters of the Poor in Borny - on
the outskirts of the French city of Metz - never imagine that
something of transcendental importance occurred in the residence of
Fr. Lagarde, the convent’s chaplain. In a hall of this religious
residence in August 1962 - two months before Vatican Council II opened
- a secret meeting of the greatest importance between two high-ranking
personalities took place.
One
dignitary was a Cardinal of the Curia, Eugène Tisserant,
representing Pope John XXIII; the other was metropolitan Nikodin, who
spoke in the name of the Russian Schismatic Church.
This
encounter had consequences that changed the direction of Council,
which was already prepared to open. In effect, the meeting at Metz
determined a change in the trajectory of the very History of the
Church in the 20th century.
What was the matter of such great importance that was resolved at his
meeting? Based on the documents that are known today, there it was
established that Communism would not be condemned by Vatican Council
II. In 1962, The Vatican and the Schismatic Russian Church came to an
agreement. According to its terms, the Russian “Orthodox Church”
agreed to send observers to Vatican II under the condition that no
condemnation whatsoever of communism should be made there.
(Ulysses
Floridi, Moscou et le Vatican, Paris: France-Empire, Paris, 1979, pp.
147-48; Romano Amerio, Iota Unum, K.C., MO: Sarto House, 1996, pp.
75-76; Ricardo de la Cierva, Oscura rebelion en la Iglesia, Barcelona:
Plaza & Janes, 1987, pp. 580-81.)
[...]
“Moscow’s condition, namely that the Council should say nothing about
Communism, was not, therefore, a secret, but the isolated publication
of it made no impression on general opinion, as it was not taken up by
the press at large and circulated, either because of the apathetic and
anaesthetized attitude to Communism common in clerical circles or
because the Pope took action to impose silence in the matter.
Nonetheless, the agreement had a powerful, albeit silent, effect on
the course of the Council when requests for a renewal of the
condemnation of Communism were rejected in order to observe this
agreement to say nothing about it” (Romano
Amerio, Iota Unum, pp. 65-66). |
(2) Vatican II, 1962-65
Once the
"Pact of
Metz"
was finalised between the Vatican and Moscow, Pope
John XXIII on October 11, 1962,
opened the Second Vatican Council, and with it
the doors and windows of
the Catholic Church were opened to the world, for the admission of “fresh
air”, that is to say, Modernism.
Modernism was condemned
by Pope Pius X in July 3, 1907, in an encyclical entitled Pascendi
Dominici Gregis.
The entry for Modernism in
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
says:
|
Modernism, the
deliberate departure from tradition and the use of innovative forms of
expression that distinguish many styles in the arts and literature of
the 20th century.
[...]
Certain methods
and tendencies which, in Biblical questions, apologetics, and the
theory of dogma, in the endeavor to reconcile the doctrines of the
Roman Catholic Church with the conclusions of modern science, replace
the authority of the church by purely subjective criteria; so called
officially by Pope Pius X.
|
Thus Modernism
is the credo of the last century that asserts: Away with authority, away
with dogma, away with the supernatural; thus away with revealed
truth, good for the last two thousand years.
Re-examining the fruits of Modernism –
in parallel with the scourge of Communism, which
caused the death of several millions during the last few decades –
is it any wonder that Pius X said that Modernism is the synthesis of
all heresies.
(3) Nostra Aetate
With the proclamation by
Pope Paul VI on October 28, 1965, of the Declaration on the
Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions,
doors which were previously closed to the Jews [Judaics]
for centuries, have been now opened to them.
In order to understand what
is behind the Bishop Richard Williamson affair, one has only to read
Vicomte Leon De Poncins’ book, Judaism and the Vatican.
The apparently innocuous
Nostra Aetate, in my opinion, has done more damage than any document
of Vatican II which, along with a demeaning attitude on the part of
the hierarchy, resulted in the Jewish
Establishment getting a foothold within
the Vatican.
Paul Likoudis
in Firestorm Over SSPX . . . Was Media Strike On Benedict XVI
Hatched In The
Vatican?
has
this to say:
|
As the
fourth anniversary of his election to the papacy approaches, Pope
Benedict XVI is at the center of a media-driven firestorm over his
decision to revoke the excommunications of four bishops of the
Society of St. Pius X, one of whom, Bishop Richard Williamson, is a
holocaust denier — a crime punishable by prison in Germany.
The Pope’s decision, which he described as an act of “ paternal
mercy,” has led to wall-to-wall criticism from heads of state, U. S.
congressmen, bishops, theologians, and TV pundits and newspaper
editorialists, who are demanding in unison that the Holy Father
firmly reject holocaust denial, and stop catering to a tiny splinter
group of ultra-traditionalist Catholics who reject Vatican II. One
week after news leaked out of the Vatican that Pope Benedict had
lifted the excommunication, some of Italy’s top Vaticanistas —
religion reporters with inside sources at the Vatican — were claiming
that the media’s drubbing of the Holy Father was a scheme hatched
inside the Vatican as a way to embarrass, discredit, and humiliate
him as part of a broader agenda to derail the return to tradition
that has been the hallmark of his pontificate
As the
50th anniversary of Pope John XXIII’s announcement convoking a council
passed this January 25, many liberal Catholics are accusing Benedict
of repudiating Vatican II and reviving a pre-Vatican II Church that
was, critics say, marked by anti-Semitism, anti-republicanism, and
paranoia over Masonic conspiracies.
On
February 3, the Rorate Coeli web site (http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com),
which is supportive of the SSPX as well as the Holy See’s efforts to
forge a reconciliation, reported that two of Italy’s best-known
Vaticanistas, Paolo Rodari and Andrea Tornielli of il Giornale, were
claiming that a plot to discredit the Pope was hatched inside the
Vatican months ago. They asserted that a Vatican dossier on historic
remarks Bishop Williamson had made about the holocaust was leaked to a
radical French lesbian and pro-abortion crusader, Fiammetta Venner,
who in turn passed it on to the Swedish television reporter who
sandbagged Williamson for the television interview at the center of
the current controversy. |
(4) Relationship between the Vatican and the UN – and the “delivery boy”
“Our
Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
On 4th October 1965, twenty days after the
close of Vatican II, Pope Paul VI, during his visit to the United Nations,
made a speech in which he said: “L'organisation des nations unies c'est
institution mondiale pour la paix et la collaboration entre les
peuples de toute la terre”;
in English, “The United Nations is a World Institution for peace and
collaboration between the peoples of the entire world.”
Was it just coincidence that, only three weeks after
the close of Vatican II the “delivery boy”, Pope Paul VI, made that
speech? Hardly!
In a similar vein, during his 5th October
1995 visit, Pope John Paul II
praised the UN:
|
In coming
before this distinguished Assembly, I am vividly aware that through
you I am in some way addressing the whole family of peoples living
on the face of the earth. My words are meant as a sign of the
interest and esteem of the Apostolic See and of the Catholic Church
for this Institution. They echo the voices of all those who see in the
United Nations the hope of a better future for human society. |
If the United Nations is “a World Institution for
peace and collaboration between the peoples of the entire world”, and “the
hope of a better future for human society” what then is the role of the
Catholic Church? Has She become the assistant, a puppet and maybe a
proxy?
No longer “Thy
kingdom come”, but One World
Government under the banner of the United Nations.
But what really is the United Nations? Charles Lamb
in “They Didn't Hit the Vatican”
throws some light on what the reader won’t find in the mainstream media:
|
The agenda
of the United Nations is unabashedly anti-Catholic, and extremely
pro-abortion. The fact that the UN promotes genocidal abortion both in
principle and in practice cannot be denied. Literally hundreds of
cases could be cited to prove this point.
According to The New American, the United Nations Fund for Population
Activities (UNFPA) gave an award to Communist China's Qian Xinzhong
for having "implemented population policies on a massive scale." ...
The hallmark of China's population policy is one child per family.
This includes, of course, forced sterilization and abortion, the
murder of children outside their mother's wombs, including lethal
injections, drowning, beating babies to death, etc.
A short
time ago, the UN sought emergency aid for refugees in the Balkans.
Flooding with fresh money, the UN proceeded to send "aid" to the
refugees. Most people would consider "aid" to be in the form of
medicine, food, and bandages. That's probably what the refugees
needed, but it's not what they got.
The UNFPA
sent "Emergency Reproductive Health Kits" to Balkan refugee camps.
These "care packages" contained abortifacient pills, intrauterine
abortive devices, and in the case the woman didn't get the message
from these items, the kits also included "manual vacuum aspirators,"
devices which literally suck the lives out of babies. |
In UN threat to all
nations' sovereignty
Bonnie Alba tells us:
|
"Money makes the world go around." The U.N.'s proposal
to tax citizens around the world continues to be a thorn in the sides
of successful and democratic economies. Almost annually our Congress
writes into the Foreign Appropriations Bill a sentence or two
prohibiting the U.N. from taxing Americans.
|
And this writer in The
Ploy - Calling Things by Wrong Names
has pointed out:
|
We have
not a few instances that show how well this messianic role of
liberator has been taken up by the United Nations today. Just
look at Afghanistan, Iraq and the Palestinians - especially at the
time of this writing, in the Gaza strip. Those are but just a few
examples among several others around the world. However, the
United Nations is not the messiah some people expected it
to be. It is a ploy.
The United
Nations …. is allowing the massacre of hundreds of thousands of
innocent people around the world, by Israel, the U. S., the U. K. and
their “coalition of the willing” to continue unimpeded. Of
course, once the name of International Community is attached to
any institution, such as is in this case, the United Nations, whatever
it does must be right, people think. |
(5)
New Mass, Novus Ordo, promulgated by Pope Paul VI in
1969
|
"The
voice is Jacob's voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau."
[Gen 27:22] |
Step by step - the
pact with Communism, the opening of Vatican II, promulgation of Nostra
Aetate, the relationship with the catastrophic UN – and now the
promulgation of the New Mass, or Novus Ordo, the scene is set.
What happened in England
during the Reformation
by the bloodied hands of
Thomas Cranmer
(1489 - 1556) has been repeated in an unbloody manner in the New Church,
by the introduction of the Novus Ordo Missae. He abolished everything in
England that smelled of Romanism, that is, whatever was truly
Catholic. In order to invalidate it, he intentionally
adulterated the heart of holy Mass, the Consecration, the supreme
Sacrament of the Catholic Church, given to her by our Lord Jesus Christ
Himself. Cranmer’s lackeys
gave Catholics the choice – attend the
New Church or die; and die they did, or at least many who were faithful to
Christ.
And what was the result of
Cranmer’s
‘reformation’? Anglicanism, or Protestantism, a spiritual desert!
If this was what was intended by introducing the Novus Ordo
to the Catholic people over the last forty years, it succeeded very well
indeed.
(6) Vatican Recognition
in 1993 of the State of Israel
What was left to be done by the JE--Vatican
recognition of the State of Israel so as to be able to interfere in
Vatican Affairs -- was now accomplished. Ever since then, there is almost
no day that Israel, with its network of acolytes, does not discuss what
the Vatican should do and what it should not do to enhance its
relationship with Israel and with its cabala of rabbis around the world.
Today the situation has
been reversed: the yesterday’s victim has become the master of all races;
while the Catholic Church, the supreme authority for the past two
thousand years, has become the servant and
victim of the former.
Pope Benedict XVI’ s
declaration that: “It is
unacceptable to deny or minimize in any way the Holocaust, a crime against
God and against humanity, especially on the part of those who follow
Sacred Scripture,”
is the ultimate farcical deviation from Christianity.
No matter, if theologians
like Hans Kung,
Karl Rahner, Gustavo Gutierrez,
et al. teach heresy. Are they
excommunicated? Alas, excommunication is reserved for special people. You
can get away with murder but you may not question the “holocaust.”
Chapter two
So, Reader, I warn you!
Don’t touch the most untouchable of untouchables, the most holy of
holies, the Jewish holocaust, or as it is
becoming increasingly known, the “Shoah”,
lest you will find
yourself in deep trouble.
Here are a few photographs which illustrate the dire
situation in which we find ourselves: a
picture speaks a thousand words.
(1)
Pope Paul VI with the group of Protestant clergymen he chose to involve in
the innovation of the Catholic liturgy during Vatican II.
They served on Hannibal
Bugnini's Commission, to fabricate a "New Mass" acceptable to
Protestant theology and practice... representating the World Council of
Churches, the Anglican, Lutheran, and French Protestant Taizé Sects. The
Lutheran representative publicly stated: "We have finished the work that
Martin Luther began."
(2) Pope John Paul II during a visit in Jerusalem in
2000. Note the inverted cross on a chair of Pope JPII.
(3) Close up of above.
(4) Pope JPII kissing the
Koran
(5)
Pope John Paul II at the Weeping Wall in Jerusalem
(6) Pope JPII and Fidel
Castro
"Who's in Charge Here?"
(7) Pope JPII and the
rabbi
“Who is the boss?”
(8) Pope Benedict XVI
visiting the synagogue
(9) Pope Benedict XVI in
the synagogue
Many Catholics were puzzled and some
were disturbed, during World Youth Day, to see a “Vatican approved
scriptural version” of the Stations of the Cross,
although few people
would have any idea what was behind this renovation of a beautiful and
moving Catholic tradition.
|
“In a
bid to ensure the World Youth Day Stations of the Cross will not
incite anti-Semitic feelings and appeal to all Christians, organisers
have dropped six traditional stations which have no scriptural
foundation.
“We've
been in discussion with the Jewish community," Bishop Fisher said.
"We're very conscious of the fear some people might have that enacting
the Passion of Christ could incite anti-Semitic feelings and so we've
had a long dialogue about how we can minimise any risk of that.
"We want
to make it very clear to people that the Passion of Christ celebrated
in the Stations of the Cross is not intended to be, is no excuse for
being, an attack on anybody and certainly for nurturing any prejudices
that people may have in their hearts.
"In
the choice of scriptural texts you can choose ones that are less
likely to be misinterpreted by people to encourage that kind of
feeling and we've chosen those texts carefully and in consultation
with others.
“Rabbi Jeremy Lawrence, senior rabbi of the Great Synagogue, said he
had not seen the details but applauded the church's attempts at
positive dialogue between the two faiths."
|
(Since it is the scriptures that are
supposed to be anti-semitic, is it not ironic that the “scriptural
stations" were retained and the “non-scriptural stations” were tossed?)
Implicit in the above statement is the contention that
Catholic people could present a danger to our “elder brothers”, and
so the World Youth Day give the JE a large say in the decisions
surrounding the Station of Cross, which is seen as a threat to the peace
and harmony of our society, and our time-honoured, tried and tested,
method of honouring the death of our beloved Saviour, is tailored to suit
the taste of His unbelieving adversaries.
On a different matter, that of the promotion of
evolutionism and the denial of the literal interpretation of the first
chapters of Genesis, which conflicts with the judgment of St. Pius X set
out by his Biblical Commission (June 30, 1909): it seems the ultimate
heresy from Joseph Ratzinger, who was to become Pope Benedict XVI.
In the first installment of a seven-part treatise and
critique of the Pontifical Biblical Commission's document The Hebrew
People and its Holy Scriptures in the Christian Bible,
in explaining the "historic method of interpretation," Atila Sinke
Guimarães quotes Joseph Ratzinger, "Fé en la creacion y teoria evolutiva,"
in Es esto Dios? (Barcelona: Herder, 1973), p. 234.]
"The form in
which the creationist idea [expressed in the first chapters of
Genesis] was rendered concrete in effect was swept away by the
evolutionist theory. With this, the faithful have to allow themselves
to be taught by science, since the way they had imagined creation
would correspond to the pre-scientific conception of the world, which
today is no longer sustainable."
|
Conclusion
The situation is very
serious; so serious that anyone who has any Catholic sense may ask: Is
this for real? It is not only real—it is open apostasy.
“My
people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected
knowledge,
I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of your
God, I also will ignore your children.”
—Hosea 4:6
I say to
you, that he will quickly revenge them. But yet the Son of man, when he
cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?
Luke 18:8.
Nadir Martello
Notes
Relevant topics:
The Protestantization of Roman Catholicism...
The Election in 1958 of Non-Pope John XXIII - Heresiarch
http://www.holy-catholic.org/arian/vatican2heresy.html
See the article:
The Romanization of Catholicism.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1965/documents/hf_p-i_spe_19651004_united-nations_fr.html
The Torture and Death of Saint Simon of
Trent
The small Simon, a
little boy from Trent, was slayed on the 21st March, 1475 A.D., on
Maundy-Thursday during Holy Week. The Jews of this town wanted to
celebrate their Passover in their own way; so they secretly
abducted the small boy and carried him to the house of the Jew Samuel.
During Holy Week on Maundy-Thursday, the day before Good Friday, and on
the day before the outlawed "Perfidious Passover", about three hours after
supper, the little boy, like children do, was sitting in front of his
parents’ house.
[...]
Saint Simon of Trent has been venerated as a martyr since 1475 A.D. In
1965 A.D., the cult was sacrilegiously attempted to be "suppressed" (which
is an impossibility) by order of the Racist Zionist Mafia in collaboration
with their
Marrano friends in the VATICAN.
This attack on St. Simon of Trent's sacred cult, by the Modernist
infiltrators holed up in Rome, was/is in perfect harmony with their
overall attempt [plan] to abandon Tradition [the Faith] "in favor" of
[i.e. with] modern Judaism.
(Note: This is further proof, as if we need more, that
the
Vatican II sect is not
the True Catholic Church, but instead is a counterfeit church, headed by
imposters who have usurped Church property. -The Webmaster)
Catholic Boy, St. Christopher, Killed by
Jewish Ritual Murder on Oct 17, 1490 A.D., at La Guardian, (near Toledo)
Spain
This is a most important case, the
circumstances of which have been clarified for us by W. T. Walsh in his
interesting book on Isabella of Spain, 1931 (Sheed & Ward), in which he
devotes pp. 441 to 468 to his researches on this Ritual Murder charge.
Walsh states that this case of Ritual Murder was "one of the chief
factors, if not the decisive one, in the decision of Fernando and Isabel"
(for the expulsion of the Jews from Spain). He shows that the complete
record of testimony in the trial of one of the accused has been available
since it was published in 1887 in the Bulletin of the Royal Academy at
Madrid (Vol. XI, pp. 7-160), from the original manuscript. The murdered
boy was canonised as St. Christopher on the authority of His Holiness,
Pope Pius VII.
http://www.stsimonoftrent.com/
Saint Simon of Trent: "Memorial formerly 24
March; removed from the calendar and veneration forbidden in 1965 by the
Sacred Congregation of Rites
http://squach.blogspot.com/2004/02/saint-simon-of-trent.html
Bloody Passovers Reported by a Jewish
Scholar
Prof. Ariel Toaff,
Bloody Passover: Jews of Europe and Ritual Homicide (Pasque de
Sangue), in early February 2007.
http://www.traditioninaction.org/History/A_010_BloodyPassovers.htm
Mel Gibson’s “The Passion”
Orchestrated outrage: it is the fabricated furor over Mel Gibson's film
The Passion of the Christ, not the film itself, that threatens to
undermine relations between American Christians and Jews.(Culture War)
Religious leaders fear implications of Gibson
film.
Newspaper article
from: South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) ; ...confirmed their fears that the film reinforces stereotypes from
historic Passion Plays: ugly, hateful Christ-killing...fears about the Mel
Gibson film are not fantastic. Bretton-Granato...by the American bishops
for Passion Plays, the Chicago priest
added...postscript to the movie: ...
Photos:
http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A300rcJPIIFeatherHat.html;
http://www.traditioninaction.org/tiabk008.htm
[Main URL:
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-115078275.html]
Excerpts from Roman Catholic Magisterial
Teaching Documents on the Crucifixion, Philip A. Cunningham
On Good Friday of that
same year, Pope John Paul II meditated on the First Station of the
Cross with these words about who bore responsibility for the crucifixion
of Jesus:
Oh no, not the Jewish
people, crucified by us [Christians] (sic) for so long, not the crowd
which will always prefer Barabbas because he repays evil with evil, not
them, but all of us, each one of us, because we are all murderers of love.
http://www.bc.edu/research/cjl/meta-elements/texts/cjrelations/resources/education/magisterium_crucifixion.htm
[Main URL:
http://www.bc.edu/research/cjl/meta-elements/texts/cjrelations/resources/education/PASSION_resources.htm]
[This doc. below re
Karol Wojtyla in particular]
In 1950
Archbishop Wyszyński decided to enter into a secret agreement with the
Communist authorities, which was signed on 14 February 1950 by the
Polish
episcopate and the government. The agreement settled political dispute
of the Church in Poland. It allowed church to hold reasonable property,
separated church from politics, prohibited religious indoctrination in
public schools, and even allowed authorities to select a bishop from 3
candidates presented.
Karol Wojtyla
was selected in such a manner.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Cardinal_Wyszy%C5%84ski
Books:
U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Bishops’ Committee
for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs,
The Bible, The Jews, and the
Death of Jesus: A Collection of Catholic Documents,
Washington, DC, pp. 110
Posted March 18, 2004
http://www.jknirp.com/docs.htm
Photos:
http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A300rcJPIIFeatherHat.html;
http://www.traditioninaction.org/tiabk008.htm
Church Revolution In Pictures
http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/ChurchRevIndex.htm
New Mass [Novus Ordo]
http://www.traditio.com/comment/com0703.htm
Jews tell
Vatican: Holocaust denial is a crime
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090209/wl_nm/us_pope_jews
At the center of
so much contemporary indoctrination and censorship lies the Holocaust,
an event that's gradually becoming as large - or bigger - than any episode
in modern history. In America today, denying the existence of God is a
trifle compared to expressing skepticism about the How and Why and How
Many died at the hands of Nazis during WWII. Significantly, comparable (or
greater) crimes by Stalin during the same era are deliberately overlooked.
This is
probably because
those details detract from what's become the dominant narrative of our
time.
The Holocaust has
come to stand for the supreme inhumanity of the Gentile world towards an
innocent and less-numerous (but greater) people. It also serves to reminds
Jews that only their cohesion, determination and vigilance can possibly
save them from the lurking and ubiquitous evil found within the hearts of
Gentiles.
[Main URL:
http://www.rense.com/general85/holfun.htm]
1) Faurisson's
paper at the Tehran Conference
President Ahmadinejad has used the right
word: the alleged "Holocaust" of the Jews is a "myth", that is, a belief
maintained by credulity or ignorance. In France it is perfectly lawful to
proclaim unbelief in God but it is forbidden to say that one does not
believe in the "Holocaust", or simply that one has doubts about it. This
prohibition of any kind of disputing became formal and official with the
law of July 13, 1990. The said law [Fabius-Gayssot] was published in the
Journal officiel de la République française on the next day, that is, the
14th of July, day of commemoration of the Republic and of Freedom.
It states that the punishment may run to as
much as a year's imprisonment and a fine of up to NF 45,000, but there may
also be orders to pay damages and the considerable costs of judicial
publication. Relevant case law specifies that all this applies "even if
[such disputing] is presented in veiled or dubitative form or by way of
insinuation" (Code pénal, Paris, Dalloz, 2006, p. 2059). Thus France has
but one official myth, that of the "Holocaust", and knows but one form of
blasphemy, that which offends the "Holocaust".
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Faurisson/at_Teheran_conf_2005.html
Pope Urged to Remove Camp Cross - Los
Angeles Times
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/jun/12/news/mn-45720
Auschwitz, Cross Spark Debate
Between Roman Catholics, Jews
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1N1-108490B3869F2D17.html
In his introduction to this collection,
Bishop Stephen E. Blaire of Stockton, chairman of the committee, quotes
from an address given by Pope John Paul II in 1997 to a group of
Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox Christian scholars assembled by the Holy
See to study together “The Roots of Anti-Judaism in the Christian Milieu.”
“Erroneous and unjust interpretations of the
New Testament regarding the Jewish people and their alleged culpability
have circulated [in the Christian world] for too long, engendering
feelings of hostility toward this people. They contributed to the lulling
of consciences, so that when the wave of persecutions swept across
Europe...the spiritual resistance of many was not what humanity rightfully
expected from the disciples of Christ. Your examination of the past, in
view of a purification of memory, is particularly appropriate for clearly
showing that anti-Semitism has no justification and is absolutely
reprehensible.”
http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=3413
The Williamson Affair
1 March 2009
Pressure from Jewish groups in Western
Europe and the United States led to a meeting on February 23, 1987 between
Cardinal Macharski of Cracow, along with prelates from Poland, France and
Belgium, and European Jewish spokesmen at the private chateau of
Baron Edmond de Rothschild in Chambesy,
near Geneva. According to the Times, the prelates agreed to move
the nuns to a “new site, at an interreligious center to be built a mile or
so away from the camp.” This was supposed to occur within two years. The
logistics of how an enclosed order of Carmelites would function in the
midst of such ecumenical fanfare was not specified; nor how the project
would be financed.
According to Joseph Bellinger, author of “Auschwitz
in the Shadow of the Cross,” [and the Carmelite nuns’ story
(and a real interesting story indeed!)]
http://www.eclipseofthechurch.org/TheWilliamsonAffair.htm
Related Topics of Interest
 Nothing
is wrong with Paul VI wearing the Jewish symbol
Paul
VI wearing the rational - I
Paul
VI wearing the rational - II
Benedict
XVI, the herald of Judaism
JPII
wears a cope symbolizing the Temple of Jerusalem
Cardinals
and Bishops wearing Jewish yarmulkes
Benedict
visits the synagogue of New York
Benedict
under the shadow of the menorah
Is
the Catholic Church becoming a branch of the Synagogue?
JPII
'blessed' by 160 rabbis at the Vatican
John
Paul II embraces the rabbi of Rome
Rabbi
demands JPII get rid of Cross at Auchwitz
The church that is in Babylon,
elected together with you, saluteth you: and so doth my son Mark. Salute
one another with a holy kiss. Grace be to all you, who are in Christ
Jesus. Amen. [1 Peter 5:13-14]
http://web.archive.org/web/20071016064202/mostholyfamilymonastery.com/Machabees
_NewMass_abomination.html
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/newmass.ram
Break Off Relations With Modernist Rome!
www.holywar.org;
http://www.holywar.org/PETITIO.htm#1
Le 14 février 2009,
à Écône,
à l’occasion de
la messe d’enterrement à
Écône des trois jeunes séminaristes emportés par une avalanche le 11
février dernier jour de la fête de
Notre Dame de Lourdes des relations très secrètes seraient actives
entre Menzingen, et non seulement Castrillon Hoyos,
mais vraisemblablement aussi le
compagnon quotidien de Ratzinger-Benoît XVI, son secrétaire particulier,
Georg Gaenswein, qui
vit dans ses appartements.
Moins connu, son actuel secrétaire personnel, Georg
Gänswein, a fréquenté le séminaire fondé par Mg Lefebvre à Écône, en
Suisse.“
[1]
VM a déjà eu l’occasion de présenter le jeune
et sémillant secrétaire de Ratzinger-Benoît XVI, aujourd’hui la coqueluche
de Rome, dans le dossier “Randy Engel interroge : Benoît XVI est-il un
homosexuel ?“[2], en date du 29 décembre 2008.
Récemment
Monsieur Gaenswein s’est illustré en apportant sa protection [3] à
l’installation de l’IBP de l’abbé Laguérie à Rome.
http://virgo-maria.info/wordpress/
Bankruptcy
of the Church & the Remnant
23/6/2003
http://www.sheddinglight.info/archives_
religion_bankruptcy_of_the_church_and_the_remnant.htm
TESTING THE FAITH
Top Christian author challenges Vatican
Comfort says Rome believing Darwin over Jesus
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89049
"It is better to light one candle than
to sit in darkness."
Benjamin Freedman
Facts Are Facts
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/facts.htm
Another word is creating more problems among
Christians. I refer to "Judeo-Christian." You see it more
and more day by day. Based on our present knowledge of history, and on
good sense applied to theology, the term "Judeo-Christian" presents a
strange combination. Does "Judeo" refer to ancient "Pharisaism," or to "Talmudism,"
or to so-called "Judaism?" In view of what we know today, how can there be
"Judeo-Christian" anything? Based upon what is now known "Judeo-Christian"
is as unrealistic as it would be to say anything is "hot-cold," or
"old-young," or "heavy-light," or that a person was "healthy-sick," or
"poor-rich," or "dumb-smart," or "ignorant-educated," or "happy-sad."
These words are antonyms, not synonyms. "Judeo-Christian" in the
light of incontestable facts are also antonyms, not synonyms
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/facts2.htm
Updated:
According to AANGIRFAN:
"With the help of Masonic cardinals, the lodge 'had
turned the Vatican into a money-laundering institution and the lodge was
also the strongest branch of the legendary Italian Mafia' - "http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2006/03/top-heroin-gang-uk-politicians-uk.html
Siri Thesis Under Attack
Part II
By H. Spigornell
[Snippets]
In Paulo
Sesto Beato? (1998), Don Luigi tells how the Protestant archbishop of
Uppsala, in the aftermath of World War II, told
Pius XII that Montini,
his own secretary of state, had been corresponding with the
Soviets, after the pope
had forbidden such contact! In the meantime, priests sent secretly
behind the Iron Curtain were being “systematically arrested, tortured
and either executed or sent to the gulag.” When a
Vatican mole was unearthed it
turned out to be Alighiero Tondi, S.J.,
a close advisor to Montini!
As an agent for Stalin, he had informed on priests serving in the
underground; and he had done this job very well indeed.
What Dr.
von Hildebrand fails to point out is that
Montini had also contacted Stalin
during World War II; and that years later, after being exposed, Tondi
himself married a Communist activist!
Following his wife’s death, in 1965, despite all the scandal, Tondi
actually found employment in Rome with the help of no less a figure than
Montini himself, now secure in his papal role.
But
that’s not all. No, the March-April, 2004, issue of ITV, truly a
blockbuster, also contains an article by Joseph Roddy from the January
25, 1966, issue of Look magazine that occupies a prominent place in the
Siri archives (Wow! So much stuff in a single issue! What oh what – or
who oh who—could have been inspiring its editor-in-chief?) To be sure,
the original title has been changed, from,
“How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking” to the much more discreet “Lifting the Veil.” Otherwise the text has been
reprinted in its entirety.
Not that
all others approved of what was happening during
the Council. At the time, Roddy
notes, conservatives, appalled by the “undercover summit conferences”
between cardinals and rabbis, claimed American Jews
were the “new powers behind the Church.”
But “things looked even worse” to them when, on the Council floor,
cardinals from Chicago, and St. Louis continued to defend the more
radical Jewish
demands even after these had been voted down.
http://www.eclipseofthechurch.org/RebuttalArticleII.htm
|
5Unwrittenlines
